PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 13, 2012Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging90 citationsOpen Access

Four‐dimensional velocity‐encoded magnetic resonance imaging improves blood flow quantification in patients with complex accelerated flow

View Full Paper
SNSarah NordmeyerEREugénie RiesenkampffDMDaniel Messroghli

Structured PICO

Does 4D VEC MRI improve blood flow quantification compared to 2D VEC MRI and Doppler-echocardiography in patients with semilunar valve stenosis?

P
Population
25 subjects, comprising 18 patients with semilunar valve stenosis and complex accelerated flow, and 7 volunteers.
I
Intervention
Four-dimensional (4D) velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging (VEC MRI)
C
Comparator
Two-dimensional (2D) VEC MRI and Doppler-echocardiography
O
Outcome
Peak velocities (Vmax) and stroke volumes (SV)surrogate

4D VEC MRI provides more accurate peak velocity measurements that better align with Doppler-echocardiography compared to standard 2D VEC MRI in patients with semilunar valve stenosis.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of four-dimensional (4D) velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging (VEC MRI) for blood flow quantification in patients with semilunar valve stenosis and complex accelerated flow. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Peak velocities (Vmax) and stroke volumes (SV) were quantified by 2D and 4D VEC MRI in volunteers (n = 7) and patients with semilunar valve stenosis (n = 18). Measurements were performed above the aortic and pulmonary valve with both techniques and, additionally, at multiple predefined planes in the ascending aorta and in the pulmonary trunk within the 4D dataset. In patients, 4D VEC MRI streamline analysis identified flow patterns and regions of highest flow velocity (4D(max-targeted)) for further measurements and Vmax was also measured by Doppler-echocardiography. RESULTS: In patients, 4D VEC MRI showed higher Vmax than 2D VEC MRI (2.7 ± 0.6 m/s vs. 2.4 ± 0.5 m/s, P < 0.03) and was more comparable to Doppler-echocardiography (2.8 ± 0.7 m/s). 4D(max-targeted) revealed highest Vmax values (3.1 ± 0.6 m/s). SV measurements showed significant differences between different anatomical levels in the ascending aorta in patients with complex accelerated flow, whereas differences in volunteers with laminar flow patterns were negligible (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: 4D VEC MRI improves MRI-derived blood flow quantification in patients with semilunar valve stenosis and complex accelerated flow.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nordmeyer et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f14c012811130d0cde2430https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.23793
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper