PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 22, 2018Circulation114 citations

Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio as Predictors of the Placebo-Controlled Response to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable Single-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease

View Full Paper
RARasha Al‐LameeJHJames P. HowardMSMatthew Shun‐Shin

Structured PICO

Does percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improve stress echocardiography score, treadmill exercise time, and symptoms compared to placebo in patients with stable angina and severe single-vessel disease, and is this predicted by FFR/iFR?

P
Population
Patients with stable angina and angiographically severe single-vessel coronary disease clinically eligible for PCI
I
Intervention
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
C
Comparator
Placebo
O
Outcome
Changes in treadmill exercise time, stress echocardiography score, symptom frequency, and angina severitysurrogate

In patients with stable angina and single-vessel disease, lower baseline FFR or iFR predicts a greater magnitude of improvement in stress echocardiography scores following PCI compared to placebo.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are no data on how fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are associated with the placebo-controlled efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in stable single-vessel coronary artery disease. METHODS: We report the association between prerandomization invasive physiology within ORBITA (Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation With Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina), a placebo-controlled trial of patients who have stable angina with angiographically severe single-vessel coronary disease clinically eligible for PCI. Patients underwent prerandomization research FFR and iFR assessment. The operator was blinded to these values. Assessment of response variables, treadmill exercise time, stress echocardiography score, symptom frequency, and angina severity were performed at prerandomization and blinded follow-up. Effects were calculated by analysis of covariance. The ability of FFR and iFR to predict placebo-controlled changes in response variables was tested by using regression modeling. RESULTS: =0.761) modified this effect. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stable angina and severe single-vessel disease, the blinded effect of PCI was more clearly seen by stress echocardiography score and freedom from angina than change in treadmill exercise time. Moreover, the lower the FFR or iFR, the greater the magnitude of stress echocardiographic improvement caused by PCI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02062593.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Al‐Lamee et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f14ca5b5f6a2886736ec43https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.118.033801
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Comparison of Angioplasty with Medical Therapy in the Treatment of Single-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease1992 · 740 citations
  2. 2Observer reproducibility and validity of systems for clinical classification of angina pectoris: comparison with radionuclide imaging and coronary angiography2005 · 7 citations
  3. 3R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing2000 · 353,391 citations
  4. 4ggplot22009 · 15,154 citations
  5. 5Regression Modeling Strategies2015 · 6,768 citations