PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 29, 2026BMJ Open0 citationsOpen Access

Women’s preferences and concerns on HPV screening sampling methods for cervical cancer in Ibadan, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study

View Full Paper
UAUduak Ima Andrew-BasseyPan-Atlantic UniversityYBYusuf BelloUniversity of IbadanMOMichael A. OkunlolaUniversity College Hospital, Ibadan

Key Points

  • This study assessed women's preferences and concerns regarding HPV screening sampling methods for cervical cancer.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional study in primary healthcare centres
  • Recruited 620 sexually active women aged 25-65
  • Examined preferences for self-sampling versus provider sampling
  • 51.6% preferred HCP sample collection compared to 48.4% for self-sampling
  • Urban women favored self-sampling for privacy and comfort
  • Peri-urban women preferred HCP collection for clinician's expertise and reliability

Abstract

Objectives This study assessed women’s preferences and concerns on human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sample and healthcare provider (HCP) sample collections for cervical cancer screening in Ibadan, Nigeria. Design This was a cross-sectional study. Settings Study was conducted in primary healthcare centres in selected peri-urban and urban communities in Ibadan, Nigeria. Participants A total of 620 sexually active women aged 25–65 years were recruited for the study. Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcome was the preferred method of collecting cervico-vaginal sample (self-sampling or provider sampling) by women. Secondary outcomes were observed differences in preferences between women in urban and peri-urban communities, reasons for these preferences, concerns on each method of sample collection and preferred locations for self-sample collection. Results Overall, more women preferred HCP sample collection (51.6%) than self-sampling collection (48.4%) (p=0.422). Self-sampling was more preferred among urban participants (53.7%), while HCP sample collection was more preferred among peri-urban participants (56.6%) (p=0.011). Peri-urban women preferred HCP sample collection due to clinician’s expertise (90.2%) and result reliability (57.8%), while urban women preferred self-sample collection because of privacy (74.2%), comfort (62.1%) and confidentiality (55%). Most women (63.7%) preferred to self-sample in a private place in the hospital while others preferred to self-sample at home (36.3%). Conclusion Preferences for HPV sample collection methods were similar, with a slightly higher proportion of women favouring HCP collection compared with self-sampling. Self-sampling was an acceptable complementary option to HCP-based sampling. Factors such as age, media access, and awareness of HPV were associated with women’s preferences for sample collection methods. Integrating flexible, facility-based self-sampling within existing health services may help address contextual barriers and could potentially improve participation in cervical cancer screening programmes in Nigeria.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Andrew-Bassey et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f154a4879cb923c4944cf1https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110692
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper