PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 29, 2026Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance0 citationsOpen Access

Abrupt changes in orientation, but not color, define the boundaries of attentional episodes.

View Full Paper
CFChloe Callahan- FlintoftJTJoyce TamBWBrad Wyble

Key Points

  • To examine how abrupt feature changes in orientation affect feature sampling in attentional episodes.
  • Conducted experiments assessing effects of orientation and color transients on feature sampling.
  • Measured color selection latency under different attentional conditions.
  • Analyzed the influence of transients on disengagement from attended features.
  • Orientation transients significantly affected color selection latency, even when orientation was irrelevant.
  • Color transients did not have an effect on orientation sampling.
  • Only transients in the attended object or location influenced sampling outcomes.

Abstract

Understanding how the brain updates representations of objects amid continuous changes in their features is crucial for constructing accurate internal models of the world. Such changes are typically temporally autocorrelated, referred to here as smooth, meaning the features at one moment are correlated with those at previous and subsequent moments. The attentional drag theory (Callahan-Flintoft et al., 2020) instantiated a computational model of representational updating that is supported by empirical evidence. In the model, attentional engagement that has been allocated to an object is prolonged by smooth feature change, which in turn increases the likelihood of reporting feature values presented after a probe cue. In contrast, abrupt feature changes, or visual transients, trigger quicker disengagement, allowing subjects to report earlier feature values, nearly coincident with a probe. The current study extended this theory, examining how transients in one feature affected sampling in another feature of the same object. Experiments revealed that orientation transients affected color selection latency (even when orientation was task irrelevant), but color transients did not affect orientation sampling. Moreover, only transients in the attended object or location affected sampling. These findings suggest a nuanced form of spatial or object-based attention where certain features, such as orientation, may play a more significant role in defining object continuity over time. This asymmetry suggests that temporal attentional episodes do not parse continuous visual input in its totality but rather may be local to the object or even feature level depending on how attentional disengagement occurs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Flintoft et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f154a4879cb923c4944da9https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001378
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper