PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 29, 2026Advanced Engineering Materials0 citations

Validation of Profilometry‐Based Indentation Plastometry (PIP) Testing for Rapid Qualification of Electron Beam‐Powder Bed Fusion (EB‐PBF) With Ti–6Al–4V Builds

View Full Paper
AWAndrew T. WoodSPStephen PuplampuKMKeaton McNulty

Key Points

  • To validate profilometry-based indentation plastometry (PIP) testing for evaluating thermomechanical properties of Ti–6Al–4V builds.
  • Utilized profilometry-based indentation plastometry (PIP) for property evaluation.
  • Characterization techniques included nanoindentation, Vickers microhardness, and tensile testing.
  • Analyzed microstructure to link structure and mechanical properties.
  • PIP predicted yield strengths of 909–934 MPa, aligned with tensile testing results of 912 MPa.
  • High-temperature PIP revealed a 45% yield strength reduction at 600°C.
  • PIP testing is up to 4x faster than conventional methods for predicting mechanical properties.

Abstract

Alloy additive manufacturing demonstrates significant promise for use in structural and functional applications involving extreme temperatures and pressures. Advances in electron beam‐based additive manufacturing are especially interesting for near‐net‐shape refractory alloy‐based components. However, it is critical to address the ability to consistently manufacture components with desired thermomechanical properties. This article employs profilometry‐based indentation plastometry (PIP) for rapid evaluation of thermomechanical properties of Ti–6Al–4V builds manufactured by a new electron beam‐powder bed fusion (EB‐PBF) instrument. PIP results are validated by a set of multiscale characterization techniques: nanoindentation, Vickers microhardness, and conventional tensile testing. Microstructure is characterized to understand the structure–process–mechanical property relationships. Average yield strength from room‐temperature PIP (909–934 MPa) closely matches average yield from tensile testing (912 MPa). High‐temperature (600°C) PIP showed a 45% yield strength reduction. Creep effects are investigated at room and elevated temperature with a range of tip velocities and strain rates, and strain sensitivity values were calculated: m RT = 0.018, m 600°C = 0.16. At room temperature, PIP is capable of predicting mechanical properties up to 4x faster than conventional mechanical testing methods. Results show consistent properties across manufactured component with some deviation when probing properties along the EB‐PBF melt layer axis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wood et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f154c0879cb923c4944e80https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202502047
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper