PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 29, 2026Tumori Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Survey among childhood cancer survivors about their preferences on functionalities of a to-be-developed Survivorship Passport Mobile App

View Full Paper
SOSara ObertiGMGiorgia ManuziMFMartina Fragola

Key Points

  • Investigate preferences of childhood cancer survivors and caregivers regarding a mobile app.
  • Survey conducted using a 19-item Likert-type questionnaire distributed by Childhood Cancer International.
  • App functionalities grouped into four modules: My Passport, My Hospital, Communication/Telehealth, and My Health.
  • Respondents rated functionalities on a scale from 1 (not useful) to 4 (very useful).
  • One hundred fifty-four subjects completed the survey, including 55% caregivers.
  • Six functionalities were rated as very appreciated, distributed across three modules.
  • Functionalities related to health care delivery were highly valued, while those related to cancer treatment were not.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Investigate preferences of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) or of their caregivers (CG) about functionalities of a to be developed mobile app intended to improve compliance with a personalized survivorship care plan (Survivorship Passport) delivered according to the PanCareFollowUp model. STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN: A 19-item Likert-type questionnaire was distributed by Childhood Cancer International among its affiliated associations. App functionalities were grouped into four modules (My Passport; My Hospital; Communication/Telehealth; My Health) and assigned to one of the Quality of cancer Survivorship Care Framework (QCSCF) domains.Data source and analytic sample:A decreasing score was given to each answer with "very useful" having the score of 4 and "not useful" the score of 1. Response data were reported with their mean (μ) score and values >3.5, between 3.2 - 3.5, 2.6 - 3.1 and <3.1 were defined as "very appreciated" "appreciated", "fairly appreciated" and "not appreciated", respectively. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: One hundred and fifty-four subjects (55% CG) completed the survey. Six functionalities were very appreciated and belonged either to the My Passport (n=3), My Hospital (n=2) or Communication/Telehealth (n=1) modules. Nine functionalities were appreciated (Communication/Telehealth n=6, My Passport n=3). Functionalities of the My Health module were the least appreciated. When functionalities were pooled according to the QCSCF, those pertinent to the health care delivery contextual domain were very appreciated, while those related to cancer and its treatment were not appreciated. CONCLUSIONS: This survey provided useful information which contributed to the development of the Cancer Survio Smart Card prototype by the SmartCARE consortium.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oberti et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f154c0879cb923c4944eb6https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916261425443
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper