PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 29, 2026Discover Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

Nonlinear impact of green finance on carbon emission in developing countries with heterogeneous income levels

View Full Paper
XNXuan‐Hoa NghiemWBWalid BakryWestern Sydney UniversityBSBehnaz SabooriSultan Qaboos University

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the nonlinear effects of green finance on carbon emissions in developing countries with varying income levels.
  • Applied nonlinear ARDL model to a panel of 60 developing countries from 2000 to 2019
  • Analyzed the impact of green finance, income, and financial development on carbon emissions
  • Investigated long-term dynamics and asymmetric effects of finance on emissions
  • Green finance has heterogeneous effects across income groups in developing countries
  • It significantly mitigates emissions in low- and upper-middle-income countries
  • In lower-middle-income economies, green finance has a positive (emission-increasing) impact
  • The effectiveness of green finance depends on the level of economic development
  • Sustained policy commitment is required for long-term effectiveness

Abstract

Abstract The crucial role of green finance in environmental protection and climate change mitigation is well established in the literature. However, its effects are mostly analysed through a linear perspective, while potential heterogeneity arising from asymmetric dynamics and income thresholds is often overlooked. Symmetric ARDL models fail to capture these asymmetries and may misguide policy recommendations, particularly in contexts where long-run dynamics are crucial. By applying nonlinear ARDL (NARDL) model to a panel of 60 developing countries from 2000 to 2019, this study confirms significant nonlinear and asymmetric impacts of green finance, income and financial development on carbon emissions. Empirical results confirm that green finance exerts heterogeneous effects across different income groups, it has a statistically significant long-term mitigating effect in low- and upper-middle-income countries, but its impact is positive (i.e., emission-increasing) in lower-middle-income economies. However, the effects of green finance are significant only in the long run, underscoring the need for sustained policy commitment. Financial development and economic growth also exhibit income-dependent asymmetries in their environmental effects. These findings underscore that the effectiveness of green finance is highly contingent upon the level of economic development, requiring tailored climate finance strategies to each country’s specific developmental context. Policy implications include enhancing the targeting and design of green finance, providing subsidies for clean technologies, and implementing complementary financial and institutional reforms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nghiem et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f154c0879cb923c4944f0bhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-02977-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Financial development shapes the effects of green funding and integrated trade on carbon emissions in developing economies2026
  2. 2Mitigating CO2 Emissions through Economic Growth, Green Finance, and Renewable Energy: Evidence from an ARDL Analysis2024 · 5 citations
  3. 3Revisiting the Green Growth Hypothesis: A Multi-Model Analysis of Climate Finance and Economic Growth in Emerging Economies2026
  4. 4Does Green Financing affect the Sustainable Economic Growth of Emerging Economies? Evidence from Panel ARDL Model2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Nonlinearity, Heterogeneity and Indirect Effects in the CO2 Emissions-Financial Development Relation From Partial Linear Additive Panel Model2024 · 1 citations