PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 29, 2026International Journal of Coal Science & Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Advanced method for integrating weak shear layer disruption into slope stability assessment

View Full Paper
YZYiran ZhuZCZhongwei ChenFCFelipe Chacon

Key Points

  • The study aims to create a mechanistic framework for assessing slope stability through disruption effects in coal mines.
  • Calibrated a blast modelling tool with full-scale, mine-specific data.
  • Simulated geological configurations under varying charging conditions.
  • Introduced shear layer roughness concept and conducted dimensional analysis.
  • Performed slope stability analyses using post-blasting shear layers.
  • Surface heave is not a reliable indicator of subsurface disruption.
  • FoS improves with increasing shear layer roughness.
  • Weak layers with 0.75 m roughness achieved 13.2% greater FoS than undisrupted layers.
  • Disruption intensity is influenced by explosive charge placement relative to the weak layer.

Abstract

Abstract In Australian open cut coal mines, floor disruption blasting is emerging as a promising technique for mitigating low wall failures by disturbing the continuity of shear planes within weak geological layers. However, the mechanisms governing its effectiveness remain poorly understood, and methodologies for optimising its design are not yet established. In this study, we present a mechanistic framework for integrating disruption effects into slope stability assessment. First, a blast modelling tool is calibrated using full-scale, mine-specific data. Then, the tool is applied to simulate a range of geological configurations and charging conditions, enabling quantification of blasting-induced disruption. To characterise the disruption, the concept of shear layer roughness is introduced, and dimensional analysis is conducted to establish a predictive model for roughness development. Finally, slope stability analyses are performed by incorporating post-blasting shear layers with varying roughness to evaluate their influence on the Factor of Safety (FoS). Results indicate that surface heave alone is not a reliable indicator of subsurface disruption. Disruption intensity increases when explosive charges are placed below the weak layer, but the effect diminishes as the distance between the layer and the charge increases. Quantitatively, FoS improves systematically with increasing shear layer roughness, weak layers with predicted roughness of 0.75 m achieved up to 13.2% greater FoS compared to undisrupted weak layers. This work provides a novel methodology that integrates blast-induced shear layer disruption with slope stability assessment, offering a scientific basis for the evaluation and optimisation of floor disruption blasting in coal mining operations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f154c0879cb923c4944f4ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-026-00888-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper