PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2006Statistics & Decisions157 citationsOpen Access

Oracle inequalities for multi-fold cross validation

View Full Paper
AVAad van der VaartSDSandrine DudoitMLMark J. van der Laan

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We consider choosing an estimator or model from a given class by cross validation consisting of holding a nonneglible fraction of the observations out as a test set. We derive bounds that show that the risk of the resulting procedure is (up to a constant) smaller than the risk of an oracle plus an error which typically grows logarithmically with the number of estimators in the class. We extend the results to penalized cross validation in order to control unbounded loss functions. Applications include regression with squared and absolute deviation loss and classification under Tsybakov’s condition.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vaart et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f17c004f0c7024d475c403https://doi.org/10.1524/stnd.2006.24.3.351
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Variable Selection Problem2000 · 59 citations
  2. 2More Comments on C P1995 · 1,096 citations
  3. 3On prediction of individual sequences1999 · 100 citations
  4. 4Cross-Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions1974 · 10,760 citations
  5. 5The Estimation of Prediction Error2004 · 474 citations