PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 23, 2020The Lancet Digital Health244 citationsOpen Access

Heart rate variability with photoplethysmography in 8 million individuals: a cross-sectional study

View Full Paper
ANAravind NatarajanAPAlexandros PantelopoulosHEHulya Emir-Farinas

Structured PICO

P
Population
8 million individuals using Fitbit wrist-worn tracking devices
I
Intervention
Wrist-worn tracking devices using photoplethysmography (Fitbit)
O
Outcome
Heart rate variability metrics across time (RMSSD, SDRR), frequency (high-frequency and low-frequency power), and graphical (Poincare plots) domainssurrogate

Consumer wrist-worn trackers can derive diverse metrics of cardiac autonomic health at a population scale, providing empirical distributions for individual-level interpretation.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart rate variability, or the variation in the time interval between consecutive heart beats, is a non-invasive dynamic metric of the autonomic nervous system and an independent risk factor for cardiovascular death. Consumer wrist-worn tracking devices using photoplethysmography, such as Fitbit, now provide the unique potential of continuously measuring surrogates of sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system activity through the analysis of interbeat intervals. We aimed to leverage wrist-worn trackers to derive and describe diverse measures of cardiac autonomic function among Fitbit device users. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we collected interbeat interval data that are sent to a central database from Fitbit devices during a randomly selected 24 h period. Age, sex, body-mass index, and steps per day in the 90 days preceding the measurement were extracted. Interbeat interval data were cleaned and heart rate variability features were computed. We analysed heart rate variability metrics across the time (measured via the root mean square of successive RR interval differences RMSSD and SD of the RR interval SDRR), frequency (measured by high-frequency and low-frequency power), and graphical (measured by Poincare plots) domains. We considered 5 min windows for the time and frequency domain metrics and 60 min measurements for graphical domain metrics. Data from participants were analysed to establish the correlation between heart rate variability metrics and age, sex, time of day, and physical activity. We also determined benchmarks for heart rate variability (HRV) metrics among the users. FINDINGS: , separately for different ages and sex and computed at two times of the day. INTERPRETATION: Diverse metrics of cardiac autonomic health can be derived from wrist-worn trackers. Empirical distributions of heart rate variability can potentially be used as a framework for individual-level interpretation. Increased physical activity might yield improvement in heart rate variability and requires prospective trials for confirmation. FUNDING: Fitbit.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Natarajan et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f24b2e270b1c22f3dd3349https://doi.org/10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30246-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper