What is the prevalence and relationship between focal and rotational activation during atrial fibrillation mapping?
Focal activations are more prevalent and temporally stable than rotational activations during human atrial fibrillation mapping.
INTRODUCTION: Defining atrial fibrillation (AF) wave propagation is challenging unless local signal features are discrete or periodic. Periodic focal or rotational activity may identify AF drivers. Our objective was to characterize AF propagation at sites with periodic activation to evaluate the prevalence and relationship between focal and rotational activation. METHODS: We included 80 patients (61 ± 10 years, persistent AF 49%) from the FaST randomized trial that compared the efficacy of adjunctive focal site ablation versus pulmonary vein isolation. Patients underwent left atrial (LA) activation mapping with a 20-pole circular catheter during spontaneous or induced AF. Five-second bipolar and unipolar electrograms in AF were analyzed. Periodic sites were identified by spectral analysis of the bipolar electrogram. Activation maps of periodic sites were constructed using an automated, validated tracking algorithm, and classified into three patterns: focal sites (FS), rotation (RO), or pseudo-rotation (pRO). RESULTS: The most common propagation pattern at periodic sites was FS for 5-s in all patients (4.9 ± 1.9 per patient). RO and pRO were observed in two and seven patients, respectively, but were all transient (3-5 cycles). Activation from a FS evolved into transient RO/pRO in five patients. No patient had autonomous RO/pRO activations. Patients with RO/pRO had greater LA surface area with periodicity (78 ± 7 vs. 63 ± 16%, p = .0002) and shorter LA periodicity CL (166 ± 10 vs. 190±28 ms, p = .0001) than the rest. CONCLUSION: Using automated, regional AF periodicity mapping, FS is more prevalent and temporally stable than RO/pRO. Most RO/pRO evolve from neighboring FS. These findings and their implications for AF maintenance require verification with global, panoramic mapping.
Nayyar et al. (2020) studied this question.