PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 31, 2016Circulation561 citationsOpen Access

Role of Diastolic Stress Testing in the Evaluation for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

View Full Paper
MOMasaru ObokataGKGarvan C. KaneYRYogesh N.V. Reddy

Structured PICO

Does adding exercise echocardiography to resting data improve the diagnostic accuracy for HFpEF in patients with dyspnea?

P
Population
Subjects with invasively proven HFpEF (n=50) and participants with dyspnea but no identifiable cardiac pathology (n=24)
I
Intervention
Simultaneous echocardiographic-catheterization studies at rest and during exercise (addition of exercise E/e' ratio >14)
C
Comparator
Resting echocardiographic data alone (current guidelines)
O
Outcome
Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value) for HFpEFsurrogate

Adding exercise echocardiography to resting data significantly improves the sensitivity for diagnosing HFpEF, suggesting resting data alone is insufficient to rule out the condition.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is challenging and relies largely on demonstration of elevated cardiac filling pressures (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure). Current guidelines recommend use of natriuretic peptides (N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide) and rest/exercise echocardiography (E/e' ratio) to make this determination. Data to support this practice are conflicting. METHODS: Simultaneous echocardiographic-catheterization studies were prospectively conducted at rest and during exercise in subjects with invasively proven HFpEF (n=50) and participants with dyspnea but no identifiable cardiac pathology (n=24). RESULTS: 14) improved sensitivity (to 90%) and thus negative predictive value, but decreased specificity (71%). CONCLUSIONS: Currently proposed HFpEF diagnostic guidelines on the basis of resting data are poorly sensitive. Adding exercise E/e' data improves sensitivity and negative predictive value but compromises specificity, suggesting that exercise echocardiography may help rule out HFpEF. These results question the accuracy of current approaches to exclude HFpEF on the basis of resting data alone and reinforce the value of exercise testing using invasive and noninvasive hemodynamic assessments to definitively confirm or refute the diagnosis of HFpEF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT01418248.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Obokata et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f29cb11b51e2fbf01871b9https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.116.024822
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper