PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026BMC Endocrine Disorders0 citationsOpen Access

Reference interval of parathyroid hormone based on the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2024

View Full Paper
RCRihwa ChoiSCSung-Eun ChoSLSang Gon Lee

Key Points

  • To evaluate the reference interval of serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) in Korean adults.
  • Analyzed serum PTH data from 4,502 adults aged ≥ 40 in KNHANES 2024.
  • Excluded participants with impaired renal function, vitamin D insufficiency, and biochemical abnormalities.
  • Defined reference populations with a stepwise selection process.
  • Found unweighted reference interval of PTH was 21.8–65.0 pg/mL and survey-weighted was 20.5–67.7 pg/mL.
  • Criteria applied limited suitable reference population size due to high supplement use and age restrictions.

Abstract

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) plays a pivotal role in calcium–phosphate metabolism and bone health; however, interpretation of PTH concentrations remains challenging because of biological variability and substantial analytical heterogeneity among assays. In Korea, population-based data on PTH reference intervals are limited, and assay-specific reference intervals have not been well established. We evaluated the reference interval of serum PTH using data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2024. A stepwise, biologically informed selection process was applied to define reference populations by progressively excluding participants with conditions known to influence PTH metabolism, including impaired renal function, vitamin D insufficiency, and abnormalities in mineral-related biochemical parameters (calcium, magnesium, phosphate, and alkaline phosphatase). Among the 6,997 participants in the KNHANES 2024 dataset, serum PTH measurements were available for 4,502 adults aged ≥ 40 years. The high prevalence of supplement use and age-restricted sampling limited the size of suitable reference populations. The number of survey-design–valid participants frequently fell below the recommended threshold for reference interval estimation (< 120) after applying criteria for vitamin D sufficiency, mineral homeostasis, and age- and sex-specific alkaline phosphatase. Among 155 participants without a history of disease, not using dietary supplements, not pregnant, and with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m², the unweighted and survey-weighted 2.5th–97.5th reference intervals of PTH were 21.8–65.0 pg/mL and 20.5–67.7 pg/mL, respectively, when vitamin D status and serum calcium, magnesium, and phosphate levels were not considered. Future population-based studies incorporating broader age ranges and comprehensive biochemical profiling are needed to refine population- and assay-specific PTH reference intervals and to clarify their implications for bone health. Not applicable.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2a42a8c0f03fd67763360https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-026-02292-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper