PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Sensors0 citationsOpen Access

Self-Explaining Neural Networks for Transparent Parkinson’s Disease Screening

View Full Paper
MFMahmoud E. FarfouraAAAhmad AA AlkhatibTCTee Connie

Key Points

  • To develop a Self-Explaining Neural Network for transparent screening of Parkinson’s Disease through gait analysis.
  • Utilized Ground Reaction Force analysis with a four-block residual CNN architecture.
  • Developed intrinsic interpretability through learnable basis concepts and relevant input scores.
  • Evaluated model performance on the PhysioNet Gait in Parkinson’s Disease dataset with sensitivity and specificity calculations.
  • Achieved subject-level ROC-AUC of 0.916, with sensitivity of 0.913 and specificity of 0.671.
  • Demonstrated that interpretability did not significantly affect predictive performance compared to baseline models.
  • Identified key gait characteristics linked to Parkinson’s Disease for personalized diagnostic insights.

Abstract

Transparent clinical decision-making remains a critical barrier to deploying deep learning in medical diagnosis. Post hoc explanation methods approximate model behaviour after training but cannot guarantee that explanations faithfully reflect the underlying reasoning. This study proposes a Self-Explaining Neural Network (SENN) for Parkinson’s Disease (PD) screening via Ground Reaction Force (GRF) gait analysis, enforcing intrinsic interpretability through learnable basis concepts and input-dependent relevance scores computed jointly with the prediction. The architecture combines a four-block residual CNN backbone with stochastic depth regularisation, a 16-concept encoder with diversity and stability constraints, and temperature-scaled probability calibration for reliable clinical operating points. Evaluated on the PhysioNet Gait in Parkinson’s Disease dataset (306 subjects, 16 GRF sensors per foot), SENN achieves a subject-level ROC-AUC of 0.916 95% CI: 0.867–0.964, sensitivity of 0.913 0.862–0.963, specificity of 0.671 0.485–0.858, and Average Precision of 0.942 0.918–0.967, reported across five independent random seeds. Comparative evaluation against four deep learning baselines—CNN-Residual, BiLSTM, CNN-LSTM, and CNN-Attention—confirms that the interpretability constraints impose no statistically significant reduction in discriminative performance, with all pairwise ROC-AUC confidence intervals overlapping. Concept-level analysis reveals that the three most discriminative concepts correspond to disrupted midfoot loading patterns, increased step-length variability, and bilateral cadence asymmetry—all established biomechanical hallmarks of parkinsonian gait—providing clinically grounded, patient-specific explanations without post hoc approximation. These findings demonstrate that rigorous intrinsic interpretability and competitive predictive accuracy are simultaneously achievable in deep gait analysis, supporting the clinical adoption of transparent diagnostic AI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Farfoura et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2a4b78c0f03fd67763c63https://doi.org/10.3390/s26092671
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper