PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Closure Theory: Physical Constants in Closure Theory

View Full Paper
RMRobert T. MorrowCChatGPT(OpenAI)

Key Points

  • This work aims to explore how physical constants arise within the framework of Closure Theory.
  • Categorized principal constants of physics into geometric, closure-action, transformation invariant, coupling, and projection constants.
  • Analyzed the central role of Planck’s constant, the speed of light, and fine-structure constant in this context.
  • Discussed intrinsic Closure Theory quantities and their implications.
  • Identified Planck’s constant, speed of light, and fine-structure constant as central within Closure Theory.
  • Provided interpretations for other constants like gravitational constant and the fine-structure constant in projection contexts.
  • Outlined open questions for theoretical and experimental validation of Closure Theory.

Abstract

Closure Theory (CT) proposes that physical constants are not independent empirical inputs,but arise within a structured hierarchy associated with geometric closure, transformation invariance, and projection into observable domains. In this work, we organise the principal constantsof physics into distinct categories: geometric constants, closure-action constants, transformationinvariants, coupling constants, projection constants, and intrinsic CT invariants. We show howPlanck’s constant h, the speed of light c, and the fine-structure constant α emerge as centralorganising quantities within this framework, while other constants such as e, G, and ε0 are interpreted within projection or large-scale geometric sectors. The role of intrinsic CT quantitiessuch as η0 and X3 is also discussed. This paper provides a synthesis of constants within ClosureTheory and outlines open problems and directions for experimental and theoretical validation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Morrow et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2a4b78c0f03fd67763cb9https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19851578
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper