PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 20260 citations

Comparing Clinical Profiles, Symptom Burden, Care Delivery, and Outcomes Between Oncologic and Non-Oncologic Patients in a Public Home-Based Palliative Care Program.

View Full Paper
MCMônica Isaura CorrêaISIgor de Oliveira Claber SiqueiraSSSonia Souza

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare clinical profiles and care outcomes of oncologic versus non-oncologic patients in home-based palliative care.
  • Comparative analysis of clinical profiles and outcomes
  • Assessment of symptom burden and care delivery
  • Evaluation based on functional status and diagnosis
  • A high intensity of medical and nursing care was maintained in home settings
  • 99.6% of patients achieved death at home
  • Functional status was a key determinant in outcomes across both groups

Abstract

= 0.0021). Overall, 99.6% of patients died at home.ConclusionsPublicly funded HBPC can support a high intensity of medical and nursing care and enable successful home death for both oncological and non-oncological patients, even in socioeconomically vulnerable populations. While symptom profiles and care needs differ by diagnosis, functional status remains a key determinant of outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of PPS-guided care planning and workforce capacity to deliver equitable, scalable palliative care across disease groups.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Corrêa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2a4da8c0f03fd67763e4chttps://doi.org/10.1177/10499091261444925
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper