PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Foods2 citationsOpen Access

Melissopalynological and Physicochemical Analysis of Selected Honey Samples from Romania, Spain, Malaysia, and New Zealand

View Full Paper
CICorina-Bianca Ioniță-MîndricanRARobert AncuceanuMDMihaela Dinu

Key Points

  • The aim is to verify the authenticity of different honey types by assessing their floral sources and locations.
  • Conducted melissopalynological analysis of 12 honey samples from Romania, Spain, Malaysia, and New Zealand.
  • Identified 16 botanical families present in the honey samples.
  • Analyzed pollen dominance to evaluate monofloral and multifloral honey types.
  • Fabaceae, Asteraceae, and Brassicaceae are the most widespread botanical families identified.
  • Rapeseed honey showed the highest pollen dominance at 96.86%, followed by chestnut and linden honey.
  • Thyme and mint honey had over 50% pollen abundance at the family level (Lamiaceae).

Abstract

Melissopalynological analysis (the microscopic examination of pollen in honey) provides valuable information regarding both the geographic and botanical origins of honey. This study aims to verify the authenticity of different types of honey by assessing their claimed floral sources and, indirectly, locations. Twelve samples of various botanical origins were collected: from Romania (linden, black locust, rapeseed, hawthorn, mint, thyme, multifloral, pasture, manna), New Zealand (Manuka honey), Spain (chestnut honey), and Malaysia (Tualang honey). In the study, 16 botanical families were identified across the 12 types of honey analyzed. The frequency of botanical families shows that Fabaceae, Asteraceae, and Brassicaceae are the most widespread. A moderate frequency was observed for Apiaceae, Lamiaceae, and Poaceae. Other families had a lower distribution, such as Myrtaceae and Ericaceae. Rapeseed honey was the most abundant monofloral honey type based on species level pollen dominance (96.86%), followed by chestnut honey (94.17%) and linden honey (84.45%). Meanwhile, thyme honey (52.84%) and mint honey (51.1%) had a specific pollen abundance just over 50% at the family level (Lamiaceae).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ioniță-Mîndrican et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2a4da8c0f03fd67763f34https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15091517
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Advanced Melissopalynology For Ensuring Honey Authenticity And Quality: Insights From Diverse Floral Resources as Diverse Natural Component to Apitherapy2025
  2. 2Integrated compositional characterization of hungarian monofloral honeys for assessing the effects of botanical origin, geography and harvest year2026
  3. 3Floral origin influences physicochemical, volatiles, and taste profiles of Apis mellifera honey in Northern Thailand2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Characterization of commercial honey samples based on melissopalynological, physicochemical, biochemical, and antimicrobial analysis2026
  5. 5Physicochemical, Antimicrobial Properties and Mineral Content of Several Commercially Available Honey Samples2024 · 3 citations