PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026BMC Palliative Care0 citationsOpen Access

Deprescribing decisions in palliative care: a qualitative meta-synthesis of multi-stakeholder experiences and influencing factors

View Full Paper
LCLi ChenQWQiaoyan WuYZYu Zhang

Key Points

  • This review aims to synthesize qualitative evidence on deprescribing experiences among multiple stakeholders in palliative care.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
  • Six electronic databases were searched for relevant studies
  • Qualitative studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria
  • Themes were generated through thematic integration
  • Identified challenges faced in deprescribing decisions
  • Highlighted the importance of effective communication among stakeholders
  • Explored the roles of patients, family caregivers, and healthcare professionals
  • Outlined barriers from the healthcare system affecting deprescribing practices

Abstract

Deprescribing decisions in palliative care involve complex interactions among multiple stakeholders, yet the experiences and needs of those involved remain poorly understood and lack systematic integration. This review aims to synthesize qualitative evidence on the experience, needs and influencing factors of multi-stakeholder in deprescribing decisions within palliative care, and to identify the core challenges faced in clinical practice. A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Six electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang) were searched from inception to November 8, 2025. The search strategy combined terms related to deprescribing, palliative care, and qualitative research. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts against predefined inclusion criteria. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for qualitative research, and data were synthesized using thematic integration. The review followed ENTREQ guidelines for reporting. Eight studies from four countries were included, exploring deprescribing experiences and needs of patients, family caregivers, and healthcare professionals. Thematic synthesis generated four overarching themes: complexity of decision-making, role variations among multiple-stakeholders, Communication strategies and trust-building, healthcare system and environment barriers. Effective communication among multiple-stakeholders is critical for addressing deprescribing challenges in palliative care. The differences in stakeholders' priorities and the barriers between the healthcare system and the environment are common challenges that need to be faced. These experiences and demands affect the appropriateness and feasibility of deprescribing decisions, and have a significant impact on optimizing deprescribing practices in palliative care, improving the quality of life and care delivery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2a4f18c0f03fd67764114https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-026-02111-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Factors impeding physical activity in older hospitalised patients: A qualitative meta‐synthesis2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Polypharmacy and Deprescribing in Older Adults2023 · 53 citations
  3. 3Factors influencing deprescribing in primary care for those towards the end of life: A qualitative interview study with patients and healthcare practitioners2024 · 5 citations
  4. 4Qualitative research synthesis2015 · 2,426 citations
  5. 5Insights Into Pharmacist‐Led Deprescribing of Benzodiazepines and Related Drugs: A Qualitative Study With Physicians and Pharmacists2025 · 4 citations