PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Lara D. Veeken0 citations

P029 Reducing delays in homecare biologics prescribing in a Rheumatology department: a single-centre quality improvement project

View Full Paper
IRIwan G.A. RazaDSDavid StanleyATAbdul Tabassum

Key Points

  • This project aimed to reduce delays in prescribing biologics for rheumatology patients receiving Homecare services.
  • Conducted three audit loops (baseline, early, late post-intervention) over a 2-week window
  • Measured time taken to process prescriptions by the Rheumatology department and pharmacy
  • Analyzed data using the Mann-Whitney U test, with secure handling of patient data.
  • Average prescription processing time reduced by 11 days from first to third audit loop (p < 0.00001)
  • No significant patient delay improvement in loop two (p = 0.20)
  • Continued slower pharmacy processing highlighting ongoing challenges.

Abstract

Abstract Background/Aims Biologic therapies have revolutionised the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune rheumatic diseases. However, their administration - often through hospital-based infusion suites - creates logistical challenges for service providers and patients. As a result, subcutaneous biologics are increasingly being delivered to patients by private ‘Homecare’ companies. As highlighted in a recent Government inquiry, Homecare services are often subject to delays in prescribing, pharmacy processing and drug delivery. Patients receiving treatment via these pathways typically have significant disease burden, and treatment delays increase the risk of relapse or progression. This quality improvement project aimed to improve Homecare prescribing in the Rheumatology department at Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust. Methods Three audit loops were conducted: baseline, early and late post-intervention; each included all patients with a Homecare prescription in a 2-week window. For each patient, we calculated the time taken to process their prescription by a) the Rheumatology department and b) the hospital pharmacy. From this, the total processing time and delay in prescription compared to the estimated due date were calculated. Data were non-normally distributed and analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test. The project was registered locally and patient data were held securely. Results Pre-intervention, prescriptions took on average 56 days to process, largely due to departmental delays (Table 1). As a result, a Biologics Coordinator was appointed to organise monitoring blood tests, triage requests from Homecare companies and chase prescriptions. While no benefit in patient delay was seen in loop two (p = 0.20), there was an improvement in delay of 11 days from the first to third loop (p 0.00001). This came despite slower pharmacy processing of prescriptions. Conclusion Significant delays in Homecare biologic prescribing create the potential for under-treatment of patients. Through a targeted intervention, the Rheumatology department has effectively reduced prescribing delays in the space of a year. While this has meaningfully improved service quality, the potential benefits have been negated by slower pharmacy processing. This highlights the need for a system-wide approach, and future work alongside pharmacy colleagues is needed to understand the challenges they face. Disclosure I.G. Raza: None. D. Stanley: None. A. Tabassum: None. J. Reynolds: None.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Raza et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2a4f18c0f03fd67764289https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag121.065
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper