PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1985Circulation561 citationsOpen Access

Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography.

View Full Paper
TSTerje SkjærpeLHL HegrenaesLHLiv Hatle

Structured PICO

Does noninvasive estimation of valve area by Doppler ultrasound and 2D echocardiography accurately correlate with invasive measurements in patients with aortic stenosis?

P
Population
30 patients with aortic stenosis, including 14 with significant aortic regurgitation
I
Intervention
Noninvasive estimation of aortic valve area using Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography (equation of continuity)
C
Comparator
Invasive valve area calculation using Gorlin's formula (based on cardiac output from single-plane angiography or Fick method)
O
Outcome
Correlation between noninvasive and invasive estimates of aortic valve areasurrogate

Aortic valve area can be reliably estimated noninvasively using Doppler ultrasound and 2D echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis, even in the presence of significant aortic regurgitation.

Abstract

In 30 patients with aortic stenosis, 14 of whom also had significant aortic regurgitation, the velocities in the stenotic jet (V') and below the valve (V) were recorded by Doppler ultrasound. With two-dimensional echocardiography, two subvalvular areas (A) were calculated from leading-to-leading edge ("large") and trailing-to-leading edge ("inner") diameter measurements. The aortic valve area was calculated by the equation of continuity (A' = A X peak V/peak V') and by calculating stroke volume below the valve [A X integral of V (t) and dividing by the integral of V' (t) (= A"). Based on cardiac output estimations from single-plane angiographic images, Gorlin's formula was used to calculate invasive valve areas. In patients with no or mild aortic regurgitation a second invasive estimate was based on cardiac output measured by the Fick method. The best correlation was found when A' (with "large" diameter) was compared with invasive results based on cardiac output measured by the Fick method (r = .89, SEE +/- 0.12, n = 16); the worst was found when A" (with "large" diameter) was compared with invasive results based on cardiac output measurements by single-plane angiography (r = .80, SEE +/- 0.20, n = 30). The results indicate that valve area in patients with aortic stenosis can be reliably estimated noninvasively, even in those with significant aortic regurgitation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Skjærpe et al. (1985) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2cb8dbe8e9f1f31c579a8https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.72.4.810
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper