PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Cancer0 citations

Drug development trajectory of anticancer drugs after initial pediatric‐eligible trials

View Full Paper
SMSamantha MartinDPDanial PitafiFBFlorence Bourgeois

Key Points

  • This research investigates the path of anticancer drugs after entering pediatric trials to understand milestone achievement and attrition rates.
  • Identified 191 cancer drugs entered into trials between 2005 and 2020 for patients under 18 years.
  • Tracked milestones through 2025 and calculated cumulative incidence rates of subsequent trial phases.
  • Analyzed hazard rates based on drug and trial characteristics.
  • 62.8% of drugs were small molecule inhibitors with 66.5% evaluating single agents.
  • After 10 years, cumulative incidence rates for subsequent phase trials were 56.1% for phase 1, 63.0% for phase 2, and 17.7% for phase 3.
  • Only 12.0% and 5.6% received pediatric FDA and EMA approval, respectively, after initial trials.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Attrition of new therapies is a major concern in oncology drug development. Little is known about subsequent drug development milestones once an oncology agent has entered clinical testing in children and adolescents. METHODS: This study identified 191 cancer drugs that first entered clinical trials between 2005 and 2020 and for which patients <18 years were eligible. The authors tracked subsequent drug development and regulatory milestones through 2025. They calculated Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence rates of reaching each milestone, and they calculated Cox hazard rates according to features of the drug and trial characteristics. RESULTS: The majority (62.8%) of the 191 identified drugs were small molecule inhibitors. The majority of trials evaluated single agents (66.5%) and were multicenter trials (77.9%). At 10 years from first pediatric-eligible trials, the cumulative incidence rates of subsequent phase 1, phase 2, and phase 3 trials were 56.1%, 63.0%, and 17.7%, respectively. Of 191 drugs, 71 (37.2%) had no new trials that allowed patients <18 years of age for 5 or more years from first pediatric-eligible trial. For drugs not already approved at time of initial pediatric-eligible trial, the 10-year cumulative incidence rates for subsequent pediatric Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval were 12.0% and 5.6%, respectively. Initial trial phase and drug regulatory status at time of initial pediatric-eligible trial were the most consistent determinants of achieving subsequent drug development milestones. CONCLUSIONS: Oncology drugs entering testing in children and adolescents are at high risk of attrition, including low rates of subsequent late phase trials and pediatric regulatory approvals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Martin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2f1be1e5f7920c638755fhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.70433
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Patient Enrollment to Industry-Sponsored Versus Federally-Sponsored Cancer Clinical Trials2024 · 32 citations
  2. 2Efficacy of Larotrectinib in TRK Fusion–Positive Cancers in Adults and Children2018 · 2,803 citations
  3. 3Costs and Causes of Oncology Drug Attrition With the Example of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Receptor Inhibitors2023 · 54 citations
  4. 4High drug attrition rates—where are we going wrong?2011 · 532 citations
  5. 5Do molecularly targeted agents in oncology have reduced attrition rates?2008 · 128 citations