PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 9, 2008Circulation512 citationsOpen Access

Inhibition of Restenosis in Femoropopliteal Arteries

View Full Paper
MWMichael WerkSLSönke LangnerBRBianka Reinkensmeier

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The success of percutaneous intervention in peripheral arterial disease is limited by restenosis. The aim of the present pilot study was to evaluate a novel method of local drug delivery. METHODS AND RESULTS: This randomized multicenter study with blinded reading enrolled 87 patients in Rutherford class 1 to 4 with occlusion or hemodynamically relevant stenosis, restenosis, or in-stent restenosis of femoropopliteal arteries. Treatment was performed by either conventional uncoated or paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters. The primary end point was late lumen loss at 6 months. Secondary end points included restenosis rate, ankle brachial index, Rutherford class, target lesion revascularization, and tolerance up to >18 months. Before intervention, there were no significant differences in lesion characteristics such as reference diameter (5.3+/-1.1 versus 5.2+/-1.0 mm), degree of stenosis (84+/-11% versus 84+/-16%), proportion of restenotic lesions (36% versus 33%), and mean lesion length (5.7 cm 0.8 to 22.6 cm versus 6.1 cm 0.9 to 19.3 cm) between treatment groups. The 6-month follow-up angiography performed in 31 of 45 and 34 of 42 patients showed less late lumen loss in the coated balloon group (0.5+/-1.1 versus 1.0+/-1.1 mm; P=0.031). The number of target lesion revascularizations was lower in the paclitaxel-coated balloon group than in control subjects (3 of 45 versus 14 of 42 patients; P=0.002). Improvement in Rutherford class was greater in the coated balloon group (P=0.045), whereas the improvement in ankle brachial index was not different. The difference in target lesion revascularizations between treatment groups was maintained up to >18 months. No adverse events were assessed as related to balloon coating. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot trial, paclitaxel balloon coating caused no obvious adverse events and reduced restenosis in patients undergoing angioplasty of femoropopliteal arteries.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Werk et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f3ae2d0482a8d7eb9f6621https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.735985
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis with a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Catheter2006 · 816 citations
  2. 2Reduction of Stenosis Due to Intimal Hyperplasia After Stent Supported Angioplasty of Peripheral Arteries by Local Administration of Paclitaxel in Swine2007 · 58 citations
  3. 3Femoral and popliteal arteries: reanalysis of results of balloon angioplasty.1992 · 393 citations
  4. 4Paclitaxel Inhibits Arterial Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation and Migration In Vitro and In Vivo Using Local Drug Delivery1997 · 787 citations
  5. 5Local drug delivery for the prevention of restenosis. Fact, fancy, and future.1994 · 98 citations