PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2017American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine1,697 citations

An Official American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline: Mechanical Ventilation in Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

View Full Paper
EFEddy FanLSLorenzo Del SorboEGEwan C. Goligher

Key Points

  • This guideline aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for the use of mechanical ventilation in adult patients with ARDS.
  • A multidisciplinary panel conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses of relevant research.
  • Applied Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology for clinical recommendations.
  • Strong recommendation for prone positioning for more than 12 hours per day in severe ARDS (moderate confidence).
  • Strong recommendation against routine use of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in moderate or severe ARDS (high confidence).
  • Conditional recommendations made for higher positive end-expiratory pressure and recruitment maneuvers in ARDS.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This document provides evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on the use of mechanical ventilation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel conducted systematic reviews and metaanalyses of the relevant research and applied Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology for clinical recommendations. RESULTS: O) (moderate confidence in effect estimates). For patients with severe ARDS, the recommendation is strong for prone positioning for more than 12 h/d (moderate confidence in effect estimates). For patients with moderate or severe ARDS, the recommendation is strong against routine use of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (high confidence in effect estimates) and conditional for higher positive end-expiratory pressure (moderate confidence in effect estimates) and recruitment maneuvers (low confidence in effect estimates). Additional evidence is necessary to make a definitive recommendation for or against the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with severe ARDS. CONCLUSIONS: The panel formulated and provided the rationale for recommendations on selected ventilatory interventions for adult patients with ARDS. Clinicians managing patients with ARDS should personalize decisions for their patients, particularly regarding the conditional recommendations in this guideline.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fan et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f40514de0dc6bdd2296277https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201703-0548st
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper