PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2026Scientific Reports1 citationsOpen Access

Multi-isotope analysis reconstructs termite feeding in chimpanzees

SBSven BrömmeVOVicky M. OelzeAMAlfredo Martínez-García

Key Points

  • This study aims to understand the dietary ecology of chimpanzees through multi-isotope analysis.
  • Conducted multi-isotope analyses of nitrogen, carbon, and oxygen in tooth enamel.
  • Analyzed samples from chimpanzees and sympatric primates in the Issa Valley, Tanzania.
  • Compared isotopic values to interpret dietary sources.
  • Chimpanzees exhibit low nitrogen and carbon isotope values with enriched oxygen values.
  • Termites contribute at least 50% to the nitrogen intake of chimpanzees.
  • The distinct isotopic niche of chimpanzees reflects their reliance on termites for dietary protein.

Abstract

Multi-isotope analyses of extant and extinct animals provide key insights into dietary ecology. Here, we examined mineral-bound nitrogen isotopes alongside carbonate carbon and oxygen stable isotope ratios in tooth enamel from sympatric chimpanzees, other primates (yellow baboons, red-tailed, and red colobus monkeys), herbivores, omnivores, and a radicivore from the miombo woodlands of the Issa Valley, Tanzania. Chimpanzees occupy a distinct isotopic niche characterized by low nitrogen and carbon isotope values and enriched oxygen isotope values relative to other primates. This unique isotopic niche likely reflects their reliance on termites as a major source of dietary protein. Our data indicate that termites contribute substantially to the chimpanzee’s nitrogen intake (at least 50%), consistent with nitrogen isotope values of chimpanzees. These findings from woodland-dwelling primates demonstrate the power of multi-isotope approaches for reconstructing modern and past dietary ecology and highlight their potential for interpreting ancient diets, including those of hominins.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Brömme et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f44223967e944ac5565efchttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45049-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper