PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 20260 citations

A Randomized, Phase II Clinical Trial of FLT-PET and FDG-PET for Early Response Assessment of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

View Full Paper
MAMelek AkayJGJennifer GlendenningHTHolly Tovey

Key Points

  • This trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of FDG-PET and FLT-PET in early response assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer.
  • Randomized trial comparing FDG and FLT PET imaging in stage II-III triple negative breast cancer patients.
  • Part A focused on analytical validity; Part B assessed clinical validity using ΔSUV and residual cancer burden measures.
  • Post-cycle imaging followed one cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PET and MRI assessments.
  • FDG-PET showed significant correlation between ΔSUVmax/mean after one cycle and both mid-treatment MRI and final residual cancer burden score (p < 0.005).
  • Increases in tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes post-cycle one correlated with greater metabolic reduction and lower residual cancer burden.
  • FLT-PET was ultimately not chosen for Part B due to inferior image quality compared to FDG.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Early identification of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) can facilitate timely treatment adjustments. This phase II analytical and clinical validity study (TNPET01) evaluated whether 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) or 18F-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET/CT can predict response after one NACT cycle Methods: In Part A (analytical validity phase), patients with stage II-III TNBC were randomised to FDG or FLT imaging. Baseline repeat scans assessed test-retest repeatability, followed by a post-cycle-1 scan in week 3. Dynamic imaging preceded static acquisitions at 90-, 120-, and 180-min (FDG) or 90-min (FLT), evaluating SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak and SULpeak. Tracer selection for Part B was based on prespecified repeatability and response criteria. Part B (clinical validity phase) examined associations between changes in SUV (ΔSUV) after one cycle and post-cycle-3 MRI, end-of-treatment MRI, and residual cancer burden (RCB) at surgery. Exploratory analyses assessed relationships between PET response, Ki-67, and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). RESULTS: Twenty-two patients enrolled. Both tracers met repeatability thresholds; FDG was selected for Part B owing to superior image quality and availability. Fourteen patients underwent FDG-PET across both parts. ΔSUVmax/mean after one cycle significantly correlated with mid-treatment MRI and final RCB score (p < 0.005). Early post-cycle-1 TIL increases correlated with greater metabolic reduction and lower RCB, while Ki-67 changes were not predictive. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET after one NACT cycle was associated with histological response and stronger correlations with RCB than MRI. These findings support PET as an early biomarker for treatment response and warrant validation in larger, immunotherapy-era trials.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Akay et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f443cb967e944ac5566ebchttps://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-26-0041
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper