PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 2012European Heart Journal160 citationsOpen Access

Clinical experience of entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in children and adults: cause for caution

View Full Paper
JJJulian W.E. JarmanKLKarine LascellesTWTom Wong

Structured PICO

What is the clinical sensing performance and safety of S-ICD in children and young adults at risk of sudden arrhythmic death?

P
Population
16 patients (median age 20 years, range 10-48 years) at risk of sudden arrhythmic death, including 12 with primary electrical disease and 4 with congenital structural heart disease.
I
Intervention
Entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation
O
Outcome
Clinical sensing performance, shock delivery, and operative complicationssafety

While S-ICD is a viable option, caution is warranted in children and young adults due to a high incidence of inappropriate shocks from T-wave over-sensing and potential delays in VF detection.

Limitations

  • Small sample size
  • Limited published data regarding clinical sensing capabilities

Abstract

AIMS: This paper describes our clinical experience of using an entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) in children and adults. Maintaining lead integrity and long-term vascular access are critical challenges of ICD therapy, especially in younger patients. The S-ICD has considerable theoretical advantages in selected patients without pacing indications, particularly children and young adults. Although sensing in an S-ICD may be influenced by age, pathology, and posture, there are currently few published data on clinical sensing performance outside the setting of intra-operative testing or in younger patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were selected by a multi-disciplinary team on clinical grounds for S-ICD implantation from a broad population at risk of sudden arrhythmic death. Sixteen patients underwent implantation median age 20 years (range 10-48 years). Twelve had primary electrical disease and four had congenital structural heart disease. There were no operative complications, and ventricular fibrillation (VF) induction testing was successful in all cases. During median follow-up of 9 months (range 3-15 months), three children required re-operation. Eighteen clinical shocks were delivered in six patients. Ten shocks in four patients were inappropriate due to T-wave over-sensing. Within the eight shocks for ventricular arrhythmia, three were delivered for VF, among which two had delays in detection with time to therapy of 24 and 27 s. CONCLUSION: The S-ICD is an important new option for some patients. However, these data give cause for caution in light of the limited published data regarding clinical sensing capabilities, particularly among younger patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jarman et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f53f93b76c9a4576d8d06bhttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs017
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper