PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 16, 2017Circulation125 citationsOpen Access

Magnitude of Soluble ST2 as a Novel Biomarker for Acute Aortic Dissection

View Full Paper
YWYuan WangXTXin TanHGHai Gao

Structured PICO

Does soluble ST2 measurement accurately discriminate acute aortic dissection from other causes of sudden-onset severe chest pain?

P
Population
1360 patients (1027 in a retrospective discovery set and 333 in a prospective validation cohort) presenting with initial suspicion of acute aortic dissection (AAD) or sudden-onset severe chest pain.
I
Intervention
Measurement of plasma soluble ST2 (sST2) concentration
C
Comparator
D-dimer and cardiac troponin I
O
Outcome
Diagnostic discrimination for differentiating acute aortic dissection from other causes of chest pain (measured by Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve)surrogate

Soluble ST2 shows superior diagnostic performance compared to D-dimer and troponin I, with a near-perfect negative predictive value that could make it an excellent rule-out biomarker for acute aortic dissection in the emergency department.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Misdiagnosis of acute aortic dissection (AAD) can lead to significant morbidity and death. Soluble ST2 (sST2) is a cardiovascular injury-related biomarker. The extent to which sST2 is elevated in AAD and whether sST2 can discriminate AAD from other causes of sudden-onset severe chest pain are unknown. METHODS: We measured plasma concentrations of sST2 (R&D Systems assay) in 1360 patients, including 1027 participants in the retrospective discovery set and 333 patients with initial suspicion of AAD enrolled in the prospective validation cohort. Measures of discrimination for differentiating AAD from other causes of chest pain were calculated. RESULTS: <0.001 versus AAD). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve for patients with AAD versus all control patients within 24 hours of presenting at the emergency department was 0.97 (0.95, 0.98) for sST2, 0.91 (0.88, 0.94) for D-dimer, and 0.50 (0.44, 0.56) for cardiac troponin I, respectively. At a cutoff level of 34.6 ng/mL, sST2 had a sensitivity of 99.1%, specificity of 84.9%, positive predictive value of 68.7%, negative predictive value of 99.7%, positive likelihood ratio of 6.6, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with suspected aortic dissection in the emergency department, sST2 showed superior overall diagnostic performance to D-dimer or cardiac troponin I. Additional study is needed to determine whether sST2 might be a useful rule-out marker for AAD in the emergency room.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f53fa8b76c9a4576d8d0d6https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.117.030469
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper