PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of lunar soil sampling disturbance based on penetration resistance method

View Full Paper
LXLan-Lan XieQLQian LiDHDing-Kun Hu

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess how different sampling operations affect the physical properties of lunar soil.
  • Conducted experiments using CUG-1A lunar soil simulant to measure disturbance.
  • Evaluated penetration resistance changes in soil before and after sampling.
  • Tested various sampling techniques including shovelling and digging.
  • Shovelling primarily causes compaction in lunar soil with optimal conditions at a bucket width of 4 cm and sampling depth of 2 cm.
  • Digging initially compacts the soil but later causes loosening, with optimal conditions at a bucket width of 4 cm and sampling depth of 3.5 cm.
  • Sampling speed of 50 mm/s and entry angle of 45° were effective for shovelling.

Abstract

Introduction To investigate the impact of surface sampling operations on the physical and mechanical properties of lunar soil—defined as the granular, sub-centimeter-sized fraction of the lunar regolith—and to mitigate design errors in sampling missions that arise from neglecting such disturbance, we conducted sampling disturbance experiments using the CUG-1A lunar soil simulant. Methods The degree of lunar soil disturbance was evaluated based on the change in penetration resistance of a standard probe inserted into the soil before and after sampling. Results The experimental results indicate that the bucket width, sampling depth, sampling speed, and (for shovelling) the entry angle all significantly affect the disturbance degree. Discussion The shovelling action, a linear penetration-and-lift operation, predominantly induces a compaction effect on the lunar soil simulant. In contrast, the digging action, an arcuate scooping operation, causes compaction during the initial phase but generates a distinct loosening effect at the motion endpoint. The parameter combination that minimizes disturbance for the shovelling experiment is a bucket width of 4 cm, sampling depth of 2 cm, speed of 50 mm/s, and entry angle of 45°. For the digging experiment, the optimal combination is a bucket width of 4 cm, sampling depth of 3.5 cm, and speed of 50 mm/s.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xie et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f5939871405d493affea34https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2026.1788224
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper