PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Systemic Treatment and Outcome in Erythrodermic Psoriasis: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

JKJulian KögelSSSandra SchuhJWJulia Welzel

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the treatment outcomes of systemic therapies in patients with erythrodermic psoriasis.
  • Multicenter retrospective chart analysis conducted in five academic centers in Bavaria, Germany.
  • Included patients diagnosed with erythrodermic psoriasis who received systemic treatment between 2019 and 2024.
  • A total of 29 patients were included in the analysis.
  • Overall, the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) decreased from 31.9 to 10.8 (p < 0.001).
  • PASI 75 was achieved by 8 patients using various biologics, with risankizumab achieving it in 4 cases.
  • Adverse events were most frequent in the cDMARDs group.

Abstract

Background: Erythrodermic psoriasis (EP) is a rare but severe condition. Because of its low prevalence, there are no standardized treatment recommendations for EP. Specific EP guidelines are outdated, prioritizing conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective chart analysis in five academic centers in Bavaria, Germany (Augsburg, Erlangen, LMU Munich, TU Munich, Regensburg). Patients diagnosed with EP between 2019 and 2024 who received systemic treatment were included in the study. Results: A total of 29 patients were included. cDMARDs were initiated in 8 patients (27.6%). Biologics were used in 21 patients (72.4%). Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) decreased from 31.9 to 10.8 across all therapies (p < 0.001). PASI 75 was achieved with methotrexate (1), cyclosporine (1), fumarates (1), infliximab (1), ustekinumab (2), ixekizumab (1), secukinumab (2), risankizumab (4), and guselkumab (1). PASI 100 was achieved with infliximab (1), ustekinumab (1), and risankizumab (2). Adverse events occurred most frequently in the cDMARDs group. Conclusion: There is a wide variety of treatment approaches. Standardized guidelines are needed. Biologic therapies, especially interleukin (IL)17 and IL23-inhibitors, showed favorable outcomes in this cohort and warrant prospective evaluation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kögel et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f5939871405d493affea63https://doi.org/10.5283/epub.79349
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Management of Erythrodermic Psoriasis with Systemic Therapies: A Systematic Review2025 · 4 citations
  2. 2Systemic Treatment and Outcome in Erythrodermic Psoriasis: A Retrospective Multicenter Study2026
  3. 3Advancing Therapeutic Horizons in Erythrodermic Psoriasis: A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology, Biomarkers, and Novel Treatments2025
  4. 4Ustekinumab is effective and safe in the long‐term treatment of erythrodermic psoriasis: Multicenter study in daily practice2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Comparison of various psoriasis treatment methods2026