PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Multimodal prehabilitation for upper gastrointestinal tumors: effects on postoperative morbidity and mortality – a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

CPCsenge PappACArmand CsontosDKDaniel Kehl

Key Points

  • The study aimed to analyze the impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in upper gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing major surgery.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from several databases, including PubMed and Cochrane.
  • Included ten RCTs with a total of 878 patients to evaluate postoperative outcomes.
  • Calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) for complications and weighted mean differences for other variables.
  • A trend toward lower incidence of minor postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo Grade I–II) in the prehabilitation group was observed.
  • Significant reduction in Grade III complications was noted using a common effect model, but low certainty of evidence was indicated.
  • No significant differences were found in Grade IV complications, mortality, cardiovascular complications, or hospital readmission rates.

Abstract

Background Patients suffering from upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancers often present with malnutrition and frailty before undergoing major surgical procedures, which significantly elevates the risk of postoperative complications. Prehabilitation focuses on optimizing a patient’s functional capacity before surgery to improve postoperative outcomes. Our goal was to synthesize the effects of prehabilitation on the postoperative outcomes of UGI cancer patients undergoing major surgical intervention using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods A comprehensive systematic search was conducted across the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Ten RCTs, encompassing data from 878 patients, were included in the analysis. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for dichotomous variables (e.g., incidence of complications), and weighted mean differences were calculated for continuous variables using a random-effects model. Study quality was assessed using the RoB2 and GRADE approaches. Results The meta-analysis showed a trend toward a lower incidence of minor postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo Grade I–II) in the prehabilitation group. While the common effect model showed significance, the certainty of evidence remains low to very low for most outcomes, suggesting these results should be interpreted with caution. However, a significant reduction was found in Grade III complications when using a common effect model, although no significant differences were detected in Grade IV complications or mortality. Cardiovascular complications and hospital readmission rates also showed no significant disparity. Conclusion The implementation of prehabilitation in UGI cancer patients is safe and shows a positive trend toward reducing minor postoperative complications, thereby enhancing patient comfort and potentially accelerating recovery time. While the certainty of evidence remains low, further high-quality RCTs with larger patient cohorts are warranted, especially to explore the role of multimodal prehabilitation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Papp et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f5939871405d493affeaeehttps://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2026.1612328
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper