PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 20261 citations

Pulsed field ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: meta-analysis of pulmonary vein isolation with or without posterior wall isolation.

View Full Paper
YWYun WanJHJing HuangYFYangyi Feng

Key Result

PFA-based PVI combined with PWI provided no significant reduction in atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence compared to PVI alone for persistent AF (RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.78-1.57; P=0.59).

Key Points

  • To compare the efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone versus PVI with posterior wall isolation (PWI) using pulsed field ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation patients.
  • Systematic literature review identifying 13 studies with 1983 patients up to March 11, 2026.
  • Analysis of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and procedural complications using a random-effects model.
  • Comparison of procedure duration and mapping requirements between PVI and PVI + PWI.
  • Cohort analysis showed no significant recurrence reduction with PVI + PWI (RR = 1.10, 95%CI 0.78-1.57, P = 0.59).
  • PVI + PWI required more 3D electroanatomic mapping (RR = 1.47, P = 0.03).
  • Procedure time increased by 16.22 minutes for PVI + PWI (95%CI 0.35-32.08, P = 0.05).

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=1,983)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does pulsed field ablation-based pulmonary vein isolation combined with posterior wall isolation reduce atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence compared to pulmonary vein isolation alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
1983 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation pooled from 13 studies (6 cohort, 7 single-arm) across diverse clinical centers.
I
Intervention
Pulsed field ablation (PFA)-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) combined with left atrial posterior wall isolation (PWI)
C
Comparator
Pulsed field ablation (PFA)-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone
O
Outcome
Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and procedural complications

Adding posterior wall isolation to pulsed field ablation-based pulmonary vein isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation does not improve efficacy but significantly prolongs procedure time.

Main Result

Effect estimate: RR 1.10 (95% CI 0.78-1.57)

p-value: p=0.59

Abstract

Pulsed field ablation (PFA)-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has limited efficacy in treating persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and requires additional substrate modification, but the efficacy of PVI combined with left atrial posterior wall isolation (PWI) under PFA remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of PFA-based PVI alone versus PVI + PWI in such patients. A systematic literature search was conducted up to March 11, 2026, with key endpoints of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and procedural complications analyzed via a random-effects model. Thirteen studies (6 cohort, 7 single-arm) encompassing 1983 patients from diverse clinical centers were included. Cohort study analysis showed no significant recurrence reduction with PVI + PWI (RR = 1.10, 95%CI 0.78-1.57, P = 0.59, I² = 41%). PVI + PWI required more 3D electroanatomic mapping (RR = 1.47, P = 0.03, I² = 95%) and prolonged procedure time by 16.22 min (95%CI 0.35-32.08, P = 0.05, I² = 88%). Conclusion: PVI + PWI provides no significant efficacy benefit over PVI alone in PFA for persistent AF. It prolongs procedure duration and does not increase complication risk.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wan et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in persistent atrial fibrillation (n=1,983). Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) + posterior wall isolation (PWI) under PFA vs. PVI alone under PFA was evaluated on atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.78-1.57, p=0.59). PFA-based PVI combined with PWI provided no significant reduction in atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence compared to PVI alone for persistent AF (RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.78-1.57; P=0.59).

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f5947e71405d493afff435https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-50715-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper