PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 20260 citations

Coupling coordination relationship between village development intensity and landscape pattern and its driving factors of 563 villages in Anhui, China.

View Full Paper
BZBohang ZhangJWJianguo WangLCLihua Chen

Key Points

  • This study aims to analyze the relationship between village development intensity and landscape patterns while identifying driving factors influencing this relationship.
  • Constructed an analytical framework using development intensity models and landscape pattern indices.
  • Employed bivariate spatial autocorrelation and coupling coordination degree models for analysis.
  • Applied an optimal parameter-based geographical detector to explore underlying drivers.
  • Identified medium-to-low overall coupling coordination degree across villages.
  • Found notable regional variations with Mengcheng experiencing high maladjustment and transitional states.
  • Vegetation coverage and construction land proportion identified as primary shared drivers influencing development-landscape interactions.

Abstract

Development intensity and landscape pattern are two fundamental components of village development systems. Understanding their coupling coordination and underlying driving mechanisms is important for guiding territorial spatial development and conservation in rural areas. This study integrates a development intensity model, landscape pattern indices, bivariate spatial autocorrelation, a coupling coordination degree model, and an optimal parameter-based geographical detector to construct an analytical framework at the micro-scale village level. Using data from 563 villages in Mengcheng, Lai'an, and Xiuning counties in Anhui Province, China, we find marked variability and spatial heterogeneity in both development intensity and landscape pattern, with High-High and Low-Low clusters dominating. The overall coupling coordination degree is at a medium-to-low level, with pronounced regional differences. Mengcheng is characterized by high levels of mild maladjustment and transitional states, Lai'an by low maladjustment and a high proportion of transitional states, and Xiuning by high maladjustment and limited transitional states, indicating relatively more pronounced development-landscape conflicts. Vegetation coverage and the proportion of construction land emerge as the primary shared drivers, while the effects of other factors vary across regions. Overall, coupling coordination is jointly shaped by socio-economic and environmental factors. Based on these findings, region-specific development strategies are proposed. This study contributes to the understanding of village development and landscape patterns and provides a scientific basis for rural planning and territorial spatial management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f5947e71405d493afff4f5https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-51145-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Assessment of Urban Sustainability and Coupling Coordinated Development: An Empirical Study in Anhui Province, China2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Coupling–Coordination Patterns and Driving Mechanisms of Traditional Villages and Covered Bridge Heritage in Hunan Province, China2026
  3. 3Spatiotemporal Assessment of New-Type Urbanization and Rural Revitalization Coupling in China, 2014–2023: Implications for Spatial Planning2025 · 5 citations
  4. 4Socio-Ecological Coupling and Multifunctional Spatial Differentiation in Watershed Rural Systems: Toward Coordinated Development2026 · 2 citations
  5. 5Exploring the Driving Factors of the Land Use Structure in Traditional Villages of Enshi Prefecture—A New Perspective on Coupling Residents’ Perception2026