PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 20260 citations

Influence of 10% propolis extract on morphology, microhardness, chemical composition, and color of bleached enamel.

View Full Paper
RORoberta Pimentel de OliveiraSchlumberger (British Virgin Islands)CSCíntia de Melo SilvaUniversidade Federal do ParáETElma Vieira TakeuchiUniversidade Federal do Pará

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess how 10% propolis extract impacts the morphology, hardness, and color of bleached dental enamel.
  • Eighty-eight bovine incisors were randomly assigned into four treatment groups.
  • Enamel was bleached with 35% hydrogen peroxide, followed by treatments with propolis extract and other agents.
  • Physical properties were measured using profilometry, Knoop testing, scanning electron microscopy, and spectrophotometry.
  • Surface roughness showed no significant changes among any treatment groups.
  • Knoop microhardness decreased in the group receiving only propolis extract, while other groups showed no change.
  • Color changes occurred in all groups without statistically significant differences in outcomes.

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of 10% propolis extract on surface roughness, Knoop microhardness (KHN), ultrastructure, chemical composition, and color change of dental enamel bleached with 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP35). Eighty-eight bovine incisors were randomly assigned to four groups: NC - negative control; PE - 10% propolis extract; SF - 2% sodium fluoride; PE + SF - 10% propolis extract + 2% NaF. Bleaching was performed in three sessions at 7-day intervals, followed by the experimental treatments. Surface roughness was assessed by optical profilometry, microhardness by Knoop testing, ultrastructure by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), chemical composition by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and color change by CIE Lab* spectrophotometry. Statistical analyses included intragroup comparisons (baseline vs. post-treatment), which were performed using the paired t-test for dependent samples, and intergroup comparisons, which were conducted using one-way ANOVA for independent samples (p ≤ 0.05)". Surface roughness showed no significant intra- or intergroup differences. KHN decreased only in the PE group, with no differences among the other groups. SEM revealed smooth and homogeneous surfaces in all groups, while EDS showed variations of less than 2% in Ca, O, and P in all groups. All groups exhibited color change, with no statistically significant differences between them. The 10% propolis extract, alone or in combination with NaF, did not affect surface roughness, enamel ultrastructure, or chemical composition of HP35-bleached dental enamel and did not compromise bleaching efficacy. However, the group treated with 10% propolis extract alone showed a reduction in KHN, whereas the group receiving the combination of propolis extract and NaF maintained KHN values.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oliveira et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f594ca71405d493afff9fahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-026-01394-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper