PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 3, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Advances in Epicardial Access for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: From Historical Techniques to Carbon Dioxide Insufflation

KHKoji HiguchiJSJakub SroubekJLJustin Lee

Key Result

Carbon dioxide insufflation into the pericardial space provides temporary anatomical separation, enabling safer epicardial access for ventricular tachycardia ablation compared to traditional techniques.

Key Points

  • This review aims to summarize the evolution of epicardial access techniques for ventricular tachycardia ablation, focusing on innovative methods like carbon dioxide insufflation.
  • Discussed historical and contemporary epicardial access techniques, including traditional subxiphoid access and modern innovations.
  • Evaluated the effectiveness and safety of carbon dioxide insufflation and radiofrequency-assisted perforation techniques.
  • Included findings from the multicenter Epi-CO2 Registry regarding CO2 insufflation's safety and efficacy.
  • Carbon dioxide insufflation shows effectiveness in separating pericardial layers, enhancing safety for epicardial access.
  • The Epi-CO2 Registry confirms the safety and efficacy of this technique for accessing the epicardium.
  • Innovations like radiofrequency-assisted perforation improve procedural outcomes but carry ongoing risks.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Patients requiring epicardial access for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia, especially those with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), and cardiac sarcoidosis.
I
Intervention
Epicardial access techniques including traditional subxiphoid access, needle-in-needle technique, SAFER approach, and carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation via coronary sinus or right atrial appendage.

This review highlights the evolution of epicardial access techniques for VT ablation, emphasizing the safety and efficacy of contemporary CO2 insufflation methods over traditional approaches.

Limitations

  • Significant procedure complexity limits widespread adoption
  • Potential damage to the right coronary artery branch during right atrial appendage perforation
  • Potential interference with existing pacemaker leads in the coronary sinus or right atrial appendage
  • Requires specialized equipment such as a CO2 canister

Abstract

Epicardial access is often required for effective catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) originating from the epicardium, especially in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), and cardiac sarcoidosis. Traditional subxiphoid access using large-bore needles remains effective but carries substantial procedural risks, including right ventricular (RV) puncture, coronary artery injury, and injury to intra-abdominal organs. These risks are amplified in patients with prior cardiac surgery, obesity, and distorted anatomy. To mitigate these challenges, several technical advancements have been introduced, including the needle-in-needle (micropuncture) technique and the SAFER approach using RV angiography during apnea. However, these methods do not fully overcome the inherent limitation of minimal separation between the pericardial layers at the time of pericardial puncture. Carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation into the pericardial space is a recently developed technique that can temporarily separate the parietal and visceral pericardium for safer epicardial access. Coronary venous exit for CO2 has demonstrated safety and efficacy, as confirmed in the multicenter Epi-CO2 Registry. Further advances include the use of radiofrequency (RF)-assisted trans-right atrial appendage (RAA) perforation for CO2 insufflation. In this comprehensive review, the advancement of epicardial access is discussed from the early era to contemporary techniques, especially regarding CO2 insufflation, including its pitfalls and the future direction of this technique.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Higuchi et al. (2026) conducted a review in Ventricular tachycardia. Carbon dioxide insufflation for epicardial access vs. Traditional subxiphoid access was evaluated. Carbon dioxide insufflation into the pericardial space provides temporary anatomical separation, enabling safer epicardial access for ventricular tachycardia ablation compared to traditional techniques.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f6e5868071d4f1bdfc6269https://doi.org/10.31083/rcm47009
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Editorial to “Carbon dioxide insufflation to facilitate epicardial access in ECMO ‐supported ventricular tachycardia ablation”2024
  2. 2Room air insufflation through the right atrial appendage to facilitate epicardial access in ventricular tachycardia ablation: a safe and reproducible approach2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Current and novel percutaneous epicardial access techniques for electrophysiological interventions: A comparison of procedural success and safety2023 · 12 citations
  4. 4Safety of Carbon Dioxide–Facilitated vs Conventional Epicardial Access2026 · 2 citations
  5. 5Carbon Dioxide Insufflation for Assessment of Pericardial Adhesions and Informed Decision‐Making for Percutaneous Epicardial Access in a Patient With Prior Cardiac Surgery2026