PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 3, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Assessment of Display Performance and Comparative Evaluation of Web Map Libraries for Extensive 3D Geospatial Data

TST. SetoTST. SetoYSY. Shiwaku

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate and compare the performance of major web mapping libraries for visualizing large-scale 3D geospatial data.
  • Performance evaluation of CesiumJS and MapLibre GL JS using 3D Tiles 1.1 and Mapbox Vector Tiles formats.
  • Comparison based on Core Web Vitals metrics at different data scales (2nd and 3rd grid levels).
  • Analysis conducted using large-scale 3D point-cloud data from VIRTUAL SHIZUOKA and PLATEAU building models.
  • MVT-based building visualization with MapLibre GL JS achieves optimal performance (FCP 0.8s, TBT 0ms).
  • MapLibre GL JS combined with deck.gl shows superior performance for large-scale point cloud processing (TBT: 3ms) compared to CesiumJS (TBT: 21,357ms).

Abstract

Large-scale 3D geospatial data visualization has become increasingly critical for the development of the digital society infrastructure in Japan. This study conducted a comprehensive performance evaluation of two major WebGL-based web mapping libraries, CesiumJS and MapLibre GL JS, using large-scale 3D point-cloud data from the VIRTUAL SHIZUOKA and PLATEAU building models. The research employs standardized 3D Tiles 1.1, and Mapbox Vector Tiles (MVT) formats, comparing performance across different data scales (2nd and 3rd grid levels) using Core Web Vitals metrics, including First Contentful Paint (FCP), Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), Speed Index, Total Blocking Time (TBT), and Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS). The results demonstrate that MVT-based building visualization with MapLibre GL JS achieves optimal performance (FCP 0.8s, TBT 0ms), whereas MapLibre GL JS combined with deck.gl shows superior performance for large-scale point cloud processing (TBT: 3ms, CesiumJS: 21,357ms). This study provides data-driven selection guidelines for appropriate technology choices according to use cases, establishing reproducible performance evaluation frameworks for 3D web mapping technologies during the WebGPU and OGC 3D Tiles 1.1 standardization era.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Seto et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f6e5868071d4f1bdfc634ahttps://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-4-w20-2025-83-2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Vector Data Rendering Performance Analysis of Open-Source Web Mapping Libraries2025 · 5 citations
  2. 2Research on the Display of Ultra-Large Point Cloud Data Using a 3DWebGIS Distributed Rendering System2026
  3. 3Design and Prototype Implementation of the Next Generation Vector Map Rendering Stack with a Special Focus on Web Maps2026
  4. 4A WebGL-Based Interactive Visualization Framework for Large-Scale Urban Seismic Simulations with a Dual Multi-LOD Strategy2025 · 5 citations
  5. 5High-Performance WebGL-Based Visual Analytics Framework for Large-Scale Behavioral Embeddings: System Architecture and Rendering Optimization2026