PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 3, 2026Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems1 citationsOpen Access

Assessing the scope for nano-urea to reduce nitrogen inputs while maintaining rice yields in India

PPPanneerselvam PeramaiyanKRKadapa Sreenivasa ReddySKSunil Kumar

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate whether nano-urea can reduce nitrogen inputs while maintaining rice yields and economic returns in India.
  • Conducted field experiments from 2022 to 2024 in Varanasi and Guwahati.
  • Assessed nine treatments in 2022 and seven treatments in 2023 and 2024 using a randomized block design replicated thrice.
  • Applied nano-urea at panicle initiation and maximum tillering stages along with varying rates of conventional nitrogen.
  • Application of 66–75% RDN with nano-urea sprays achieved yields comparable to 100% RDN.
  • Utilizing 50% RDN with nano-urea resulted in a 17% yield penalty in Guwahati and 16-19% in Varanasi.
  • Savings of 27-40 kg N ha−1 in Varanasi and 15-20 kg N ha−1 in Guwahati were possible without yield loss.

Abstract

Excessive nitrogen (N) fertilizer use in rice ( Oryza sativa L.) cultivation results in significant nutrient losses and environmental degradation. Nano fertilizers offer a promising solution to enhance nutrient use efficiency, reduce losses, and mitigate environmental impacts in rice-based systems. This study aims to evaluate the effects of nano-urea application on rice yield, economic returns, and N use efficiency in India. Field experiments (2022–2024) were conducted at Varanasi and Guwahati, assessing nine treatments in 2022 and seven treatments in 2023 and 2024 in a Randomized block design (RBD) replicated thrice. Treatments included conventional soil-applied N at 75, 66, and 50% of the recommended dose (RDN) and was tested with foliar applications of nano-urea, applied once at panicle initiation (PI) or twice at maximum tillering (MT) and PI. These were compared with control and state fertilizer N rate. Application of 66–75% RDN with nano-urea applied twice (MT and PI) produced yields comparable to 100% RDN. However, applying nano-urea with 50% RDN resulted in a yield penalty of 17% (0.88 t ha −1 ) in Guwahati (2023–2024) and 16–19% (0.95–1.2 t ha −1 ) in Varanasi (2022–2023). Our findings indicate that 27–40 kg N ha −1 can be saved in Varanasi and 15–20 kg N ha −1 in Guwahati without yield loss using RDN 66–75% with nano-urea. N 66 –N 75% with nano urea sprays achieved economic returns comparable to RDN 100 , with reduced N inputs. Based on these findings, the application of urea at 66–75% RDN is recommended, supplemented with two foliar applications of nano-urea at MT and PI stages to sustain yield while reducing overall N input.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Peramaiyan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f6e6478071d4f1bdfc6ef6https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2026.1759447
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Nutrient use efficiency in perennial fruit crops—A review2017 · 76 citations
  2. 24R stewardship-based potassium application to enhance iron, zinc, and copper nutrient levels in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Sustainable intensification: overcoming land and water constraints on food production2015 · 125 citations
  4. 4Nitrogen and phosphorus losses and eutrophication potential associated with fertilizer application to cropland in China2017 · 595 citations
  5. 5Zinc use efficiency is enhanced in wheat through nanofertilization2018 · 165 citations