PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 3, 2026Governance0 citationsOpen Access

The Supply Chain of Economic Ideas: Institutional Discourse and Policy Change in U.S. Economic Governance, 1945–2024

View Full Paper
JWJ.D. WoodVAValentina Ausserladscheider

Key Points

  • This paper aims to explore how institutional networks influence economic policymaking and shifts between paradigms in the U.S. from 1945 to 2024.
  • Developed a supply chain of economic ideas framework
  • Conducted quantitative text analysis of 233 documents from Federal Reserve, Economic Reports, and Joint Economic Committee (1945–2024)
  • Evaluated transitions in economic paradigms through institutional networks.
  • Neoliberalism arose from reconfiguring institutional networks instead of replacing Keynesianism altogether.
  • The Federal Reserve maintained neoliberalism's core objective while institutions diverged significantly.
  • Paradigmatic coherence persisted through events like the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, indicating stability beyond mere surface reorganization.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper develops the supply chain of economic ideas framework to address how institutional networks coordinate to achieve both stability and change in economic policymaking, arguing that both are products of the same institutional processes with coherence emerging through differentiation rather than convergence. A quantitative text analysis of 233 documents from the Federal Reserve, Economic Reports of the President, and Joint Economic Committee (1945–2024) reveals that the transition from Keynesianism to neoliberalism in the USA occurred through a reconfiguration of the governing institutional network rather than wholesale replacement of the paradigm; that the Federal Reserve anchored neoliberalism's core objective through vertical integration whilst supporting institutions diverged substantially; and that the paradigm's coherence persisted through the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, providing a criterion for distinguishing paradigmatic reorganisation from genuine paradigmatic change. The framework thus provides a means to assess whether contemporary political challenges to economic governance represent a surface‐level reorganisation of existing policies or a fundamental paradigmatic transformation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wood et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f6e6648071d4f1bdfc71a9https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70132
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper