PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 3, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Diverging or Converging? Litigation Rates in Japan and Germany (1995–2023) A Comparative Analysis of Trends and Determinants

View Full Paper
LKLisa Marie Kunze

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to compare litigation rates in Japan and Germany between 1995 and 2023, examining the trends and determinants.
  • Functional approach to analyzing civil dispute resolution forms
  • Comparative analysis of litigation trends across both countries
  • Evaluation of the impact of digitalisation on litigation processes
  • Japan maintains persistently low litigation levels, while Germany's rates show a noticeable decline.
  • Temporary litigation peaks are observed in both countries due to mass claims like Japan's 'litigation bubble' and Germany's diesel litigation.
  • Digitalisation plays a growing role in facilitating large-scale litigation through standardisation.

Abstract

This paper compares litigation rates in Japan and Germany from 1995 to 2023 using a functional approach that includes various forms of civil dispute resolution. It confirms the persistently low litigation levels in Japan, while Germany, despite higher absolute rates, exhibits a noticeable decline across all types of proceedings. Temporary peaks, such as Japan’s “litigation bubble” and Germany’s diesel litigation, illustrate the impact of mass claims. The findings highlight the growing role of digitalisation, particularly in facilitating large-scale litigation through standardisation. By contrasting the two legal systems, the paper identifies both country-specific and parallel developments, contributing to the debate on whether declining litigation rates reflect reduced demand for courts or a shift toward alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lisa Marie Kunze (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f6e6e68071d4f1bdfc7824https://doi.org/10.21248/gups.fralr.26.1.05
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper