PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 3, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

The Criminalization of Social Movements during the Bolsonaro Government (2019–22): State-Centered Perspectives on Crimes of the State

RCRoxana Pessoa CavalcantiGBGuilherme Figueredo Benzaquen

Key Points

  • This article investigates the state's role in criminalizing social movements in Brazil during the pandemic, highlighting the intersection of state and corporate power.
  • Conducted 25 in-depth, semi-structured interviews with social justice activists
  • Analyzed the linkage between state actions and the deterioration of relations with progressive organizations
  • Utilized a framework that integrates Southern theory with state crime scholarship
  • Criminalization was used strategically to demobilize social movements by framing dissent as criminal activity
  • Increased police repression and surveillance practices targeted organizers, escalating intimidation
  • The governance during the pandemic heightened coercive practices that undermined democratic institutions

Abstract

This article examines the criminalization and repression of social movements in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic as forms of state crime. It conceptualizes the articulation between the state and corporations as a central means to produce and sustain structural violence. Integrating Southern theory with state crime scholarship, we develop an analytical approach from below for understanding contemporary criminalization and repression within conjunctures of authoritarian governance and capital protection, which extend beyond Brazil, but take a distinctive form within it. Empirically, we use Brazil under Jair Bolsonaro (2019–2022) as an illustrative case of democratic backsliding in which pandemic governance intensified coercive and exclusionary state practices. Drawing on 25 in-depth, semi-structured interviews with social justice activists, we analyze how relations between the state and progressive organizations deteriorated through intensified repressive and authoritarian practices. This study reveals how criminalization served as a strategic tool, alongside the erosion of dialogue and dismantling of democratic institutions, to attempt to demobilize social movements through legal proceedings that reframed dissent as crime, surveillance practices targeting organizers and police repression that escalated intimidation. We argue that these components were mobilized in a climate of heightened crisis conditions to suppress organized dissent and accelerate state-corporate protection of capital interests .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cavalcanti et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f6e6e68071d4f1bdfc7847https://doi.org/10.13169/statecrime.14.2.0004
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Os impactos sociais da Covid-19 no Brasil: populações vulnerabilizadas e respostas à pandemia2021 · 94 citations
  2. 2Regulatory Rollbacks in the Amazon Rainforest: A Nuanced Look into the Effects of Environmental Victimization2021 · 4 citations
  3. 3Policing the Crisis1978 · 3,947 citations
  4. 4A extinção de conselhos e fóruns participativos pelo Decreto n. 9.759/192020 · 2 citations
  5. 5A política das ruas: protestos em São Paulo de Dilma a Temer2017 · 79 citations