PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 4, 2026Bulgarian Cardiology0 citationsOpen Access

From morphology to risk: contemporary classification systems in acute aortic dissection

DKDimitar KyuchukovMedical University of Sofia

Key Result

Contemporary classification systems and risk stratification models for acute aortic dissection facilitate individualized multidisciplinary treatment strategies and outcome prediction.

Key Points

  • This review aims to present widely used classification systems and outcome prediction models for acute aortic dissections.
  • Review of various classification systems developed over the past 70 years for acute aortic dissection
  • Examination of anatomical parameters and clinical indicators involved in intervention decisions
  • Analysis of tools for preprocedural risk assessment and prediction of therapeutic outcomes.
  • Significant variation in mortality (5-65%) and morbidity (8-80%) associated with surgical interventions
  • Individual clinical and morphological characteristics critically influence therapeutic strategies
  • Increase in need for reliable classification and risk assessment tools in clinical practice.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Patients with acute aortic dissection
I
Intervention
Classification systems and outcome prediction models

This review summarizes contemporary classification systems and risk prediction models for acute aortic dissection to guide individualized multidisciplinary therapeutic strategies.

Abstract

Acute aortic dissection is a critical surgical condition that in most cases requires immediate intervention. Despite signi cant advances in surgical and interventional technologies, repair remains increasingly complex. It is associated with considerable mortality (5-65%, average postoperative mortality 20%) and morbidity (8-80%, 20% on average), which signi cantly depend on the individual clinical and morphological characteristics of each patient. The need for an individualised multidisciplinary approach in establishing the diagnosis, clarifying the anatomical parameters of the involvement initial intimal tear, characteristics and extension of the false lumen, involved arterial branches, and clinical indicators for the presence of end-organ malperfusion are key points in choosing a therapeutic strategy (surgical, medical, endovascular, or hybrid). To facilitate these decisions and systematise the diagnostic and therapeutic approach over the past more than 70 years, as data have accumulated, various classi cation systems have been proposed based on speci c characteristics of the disease process and associated risks. Alongside these processes, the need for reliable tools for preprocedural risk assessment and prediction of the nal therapeutic outcome has increased signi cantly. This review aims to present the most widely used classi cation systems and outcome prediction models for acute aortic dissections, and to examine their role in decision-making.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dimitar Kyuchukov (2026) conducted a review in Acute aortic dissection. Contemporary classification systems and risk stratification models for acute aortic dissection facilitate individualized multidisciplinary treatment strategies and outcome prediction.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f836aa3ed186a739980db1https://doi.org/10.3897/bgcardio.32.e184554
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper