PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 4, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Voltage Stability for Power Systems deploying Physics-Grounded ML: Fast Risk Mapping with MATPOWER for Sustainable Future in Smart Grids

View Full Paper
RWRajitha WattegamaTeesside UniversityMSMichael ShortTeesside UniversityGAGeetika AggarwalTeesside University

Key Points

  • This paper aims to enhance voltage stability analysis in smart grids by integrating machine learning with traditional methods.
  • Developed a physics-based machine learning model using MATPOWER simulations and an ensemble classifier.
  • Created operating scenarios by varying load levels, renewable penetration, and network stress factors.
  • Trained the model on a balanced dataset, achieving high ROC-AUC and PR-AUC scores.
  • Achieved ROC-AUC = 0.973 and PR-AUC = 0.715 with calibrated probabilities from five-fold cross-validation.
  • Demonstrated model processed scenarios thousands of times faster than traditional methods while maintaining accuracy.
  • Identified load level and renewable penetration as major instability factors.

Abstract

Voltage stability in modern smart grids faces increasing challenges due to the widespread use of renewable energy and diminished reactive-power margins. While power flow analysis remains the most precise method, it is often too slow and resource-intensive for exploring extensive operating spaces. This paper introduces a physics-based machine learning approach that combines MATPOWER simulations with an ensemble classifier to efficiently generate clear and interpretable instability risk maps for the IEEE-14 system. By varying load levels, renewable penetration (represented as negative PQ-bus injections), and specific network stress factors, operating scenarios are created; a scenario is deemed unstable if power flow fails to converge or if the lowest bus voltage falls below 0.94 p.u. Trained on a balanced dataset with approximately 40% unstable cases, the model achieved ROC-AUC = 0.973 and PR-AUC = 0.715 through five-fold cross-validation, with well- calibrated probabilities. Feature analysis identified load level and renewable penetration as primary causes of instability. The model delivers results thousands of times faster than traditional methods while maintaining high accuracy, enabling practical screening, enhanced risk understanding, and targeted use of CPF for final margin assessment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wattegama et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f836aa3ed186a739980e36https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636703012
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper