PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 4, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Congenital urinary tract dilation: when is it clinically significant and when should it prompt intervention?

GIGunes IsikCOCemil Oktay

Key Points

  • Assessing the characteristics, resolution timing, and need for surgical intervention in congenital urinary tract dilation.
  • Retrospective evaluation of 341 children at Adiyaman University Pediatric Nephrology Clinic from 2021 to 2023.
  • Classification of urinary tract dilation severity based on ultrasonographic AP diameter: normal (<10 mm), mild-moderate (10–15 mm), severe (>15 mm).
  • Analysis of outcomes related to spontaneous resolution, advanced imaging, and surgical interventions.
  • Among patients, 36.2% had severe dilation and 63.8% had mild-to-moderate dilation.
  • Surgery was required in 22.6%, primarily for severe cases at a rate of 56.1% versus 3.7% for mild-to-moderate (p < 0.001).
  • An AP diameter cutoff of 17 mm for surgery had 88.3% sensitivity and 84.1% specificity with AUC of 0.936 (p < 0.001).

Abstract

BackgroundUrinary tract dilation is the most common urinary tract anomaly detected on prenatal ultrasonography. Postnatal follow-up, the necessity of advanced imaging, and indications for surgical intervention remain confusing and subject to ongoing debate.ObjectivesOur aim is to evaluate the etiology, clinical and radiological characteristics of congenital urinary tract dilation, and assess the timing and outcomes of spontaneous resolution, advanced imaging, surgical interventions, and postoperative follow-up.MethodsThis retrospective study evaluated the etiology, clinical and radiological features, and outcomes of congenital urinary tract dilation in children at Adiyaman University Pediatric Nephrology Clinic between November 2021 and 2023. Urinary tract dilation was classified by ultrasonographic anteroposterior (AP) diameter on postnatal urinary system ultrasonography as normal (15 mm).ResultsAmong 341 patients (71.3% male), 36.2% had severe and 63.8% had mild-to-moderate urinary tract dilation. Mean AP diameter was 14.4 ± 7.0 mm. Urinary tract dilation resolved in 96.2% of patients, typically within 3–44 months (mean 11 ± 6.3). Surgery was required in 22.6% of patients, mostly for ureteropelvic junction obstruction and vesicoureteral reflux, and was significantly more common in severe cases (56.1% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001). Severe urinary tract dilation was significantly associated with family history of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract, history of urinary tract infection (UTI), reduced kidney function, and abnormal dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scintigraphy findings (p < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated high predictive performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.936, 95% confidence interval: 0.908–0.963; p < 0.001). An AP diameter cutoff value of 17 mm predicted surgical intervention, with 88.3% sensitivity and 84.1% specificity.ConclusionAn AP diameter ≥17 mm, decreased differential kidney function, UTI history, and family history of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract are strong indicators for surgical intervention.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Isik et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f836d93ed186a7399810cdhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2026.1757626
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper