PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 4, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Perception and challenges of the mentor-mentee programme in a medical college of Prayagraj, India: an observational, cross-sectional, mixed-method study

View Full Paper
ASAnjani Kumar SrivastavaInstitute of Medical SciencesASArun Kumar SinghUniversity of DelhiASAnuj SinghIndian Institute of Information Technology Allahabad

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate perceptions and challenges of the Mentor-Mentee Programme among medical students and faculty.
  • Conducted an observational, cross-sectional mixed methods study with universal sampling.
  • Collected data using pre-validated semi-structured questionnaires from 411 mentees and 103 mentors.
  • Analyzed quantitative data with descriptive and inferential statistics; qualitative data underwent thematic analysis.
  • 89.5% of mentees confirmed mentor assignment; however, 71.8% reported no meetings in the last six months.
  • 26.8% of mentees and 36.9% of mentors reported overall satisfaction with the program.
  • Major implementation barriers included time constraints (50-60% of issues), lack of structured schedules (64.5% of mentees), and inadequate institutional support.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate perceptions and challenges regarding the National Medical Commission-mandated Mentor-Mentee Programme among undergraduate medical students and faculty in Prayagraj, India. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional mixed methods study was done between August 2025 and January 2026 at the United Institute of Medical Sciences. Employing universal sampling, pre-validated semi-structured questionnaires were filled by 411 MBBS mentees and 103 faculty mentors. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, whilst qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis. Results: Despite 89.5% of mentees confirming mentor assignment, 71.8% reported no meetings in the preceding six months. Overall satisfaction was low, reported by only 26.8% of mentees and 36.9% of mentors. Both cohorts strongly acknowledged the program's intrinsic conceptual value for academic guidance and emotional support. However, significant implementation barriers were identified: time constraints dominated qualitative themes (comprising 50–60% of reported problems), followed by the absence of structured schedules (agreed upon by 64.5% of mentees), and inadequate institutional support. Consequently, 55.7% of mentees perceived the initiative as existing solely "on paper". Mentors echoed these logistical hurdles, with 46.6% reporting infrequent or no interactions with their mentees. Conclusion: While theoretically valued, the current mentoring program functions nominally rather than practically due to systemic and logistical barriers. Optimising this initiative demands urgent institutional reforms, including mandatory, timetabled sessions, digital communication tools, and robust oversight mechanisms to support holistic student development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Srivastava et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f837c23ed186a739981fa3https://doi.org/10.62425/jmefm.1912271
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper