PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026International Journal of Civil Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Monitoring Building Settlements Using Space–Time Cubes and Geospatial AI

View Full Paper
LBLuigi BarazzettiMPM. PrevitaliFRFabio Roncoroni

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the use of space-time cubes and geospatial AI for monitoring structural settlements.
  • Application of space-time cubes for visualizing multi-temporal monitoring data
  • Integration of geospatial AI for predictive analysis
  • Examination of accuracy across multiple prediction steps using least-squares statistics
  • Machine-learning forecasts remain reliable for at least three prediction steps ahead
  • Achieved precision of ± 0.2–0.3 mm in detecting structural discontinuities
  • Effective framework for monitoring projects with distinct characteristics

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the application of space–time cubes (S–T cubes) and geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI) for monitoring vertical settlements in structures. Although S–T cubes are not commonly employed in this type of structural analysis, they enable the storage and visualization of multi-temporal monitoring data, offering an effective framework to represent differential settlement over time within a defined spatial domain, including at the scale of individual structural elements. The study further integrates GeoAI techniques for predictive analysis aimed at detecting discontinuities, leveraging the temporal datasets organized within S–T cubes. We employ an index that combines accuracy across multiple prediction steps with least-squares statistics of adjusted data. This provides users with a rapid diagnostic to verify the effectiveness of forecasts before deeper analysis. Results from three datasets—each representing a monitoring project with distinct characteristics—demonstrate that machine-learning-based forecasts remain reliable for at least three prediction steps ahead. This level of consistency is sufficient to support the detection of discontinuities in new monitoring campaigns, with a precision on the order of ± 0.2–0.3 mm.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barazzetti et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8e0b04f884e66b5304d2https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-026-01231-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper