PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026International Journal of Protective Structures0 citations

Structural response and failure modes of armor steel plates under dynamic underwater explosions

View Full Paper
PLPrince Jeya Lal LazarChennai Mathematical InstituteVKVishnu Vijay KumarNew York University Abu DhabiKSKhaled ShahinNew York University Abu Dhabi

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze the performance of different steel alloys under dynamic underwater explosive loading.
  • Examined armor steels and sandwich panels using nonlinear finite-element simulations
  • Utilized the Johnson–Cook plasticity model to assess blast performance
  • Assessed deformation, equivalent plastic strain, and energy dissipation for varied explosive loads
  • AISI 4340 showed minimal deformation and high stability under blasts
  • AL6XN performed well at moderate loads but degraded under higher intensities due to thermal softening
  • SS304 had reasonable deformation with good energy absorption capacity
  • Mild Steel had the highest deformation and energy dissipation
  • At lower blast intensities, energy is absorbed mainly by the front face sheet, while core contribution increases at higher intensities

Abstract

In this research, we examine the dynamic deformation and blast-tolerance of all-metal plates and sandwich panels under underwater explosive (UNDEX) loading. The blast performance of four alloys, Mild Steel (MS), SS304, AL6XN, and AISI 4340, was based on the Johnson–Cook (JC) plasticity model as the shock factors increased from 0.42 to 0.73. The Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) model and nonlinear finite-element simulations were employed in the present computational analysis to yield measurable results for the deformation and equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) of the target plates and the plastic dissipation energy of the sandwich panels. AISI 4340 consistently showed the most stability after each blast series, indicating that the material undergoes the least deformation and exhibits the lowest PEEQ due to its extremely high yield strength and resistance to plastic deformation. AL6XN exhibited appreciable performance under moderate shock and stress levels due to its pronounced strain-hardening behaviour; however, higher load levels reduced performance due to thermal softening. The SS304 exhibited reasonable deformation in addition to exhibiting a generous energy absorption capacity. Mild Steel deformed the most and had the highest PEEQ, while also having the most plastic energy dissipation. The sandwich panels subjected to underwater shock conditions demonstrate that at lower blast intensities, most of the blast energy is absorbed by the front face sheet. However, at higher blast intensities, the core’s contribution to energy absorption increases, thereby aiding energy distribution and enhancing overall stability. The blast-mitigation properties of AISI 4340 were outstanding, whereas SS304 and AL6XN improved the suitability of moderate designs for blast-tolerant applications. These analyses will help select the steels that optimize performance in marine, defense, and subsea applications for blast-resistant protective structures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lazar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8e8904f884e66b530d74https://doi.org/10.1177/20414196261448225
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper