PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 20260 citations

Geodiversity and resilience: A scoping review.

View Full Paper
MTMaija ToivanenUniversity of OuluDSDaniel SantosServiço Geológico do Brasil - CPRMARAleksi RäsänenUniversity of Oulu

Key Points

  • This review aims to examine connections between geodiversity, geoheritage, and resilience concepts.
  • Conducted a systematic scoping review of 90 studies from 2012 to 2025
  • Analyzed the engagement of resilience frameworks in geodiversity and geoheritage research
  • Identified barriers limiting the integration of resilience thinking and geodiversity
  • Most studies demonstrated implicit engagement with resilience despite lacking explicit frameworks
  • Geodiversity offers a vital perspective by including physical environments in resilience thinking
  • Three barriers to effective integration include disconnected disciplinary communities, descriptive evidence, and lagging governance for geodiversity.

Abstract

Resilience thinking has become central to addressing environmental and societal challenges, yet it focuses primarily on ecological and social dimensions while physical foundations remain underrepresented. This systematic scoping review examined 90 geodiversity and geoheritage studies (2012-2025) analysing connections to resilience concepts. While most reviewed studies lack explicit resilience frameworks, they demonstrate extensive implicit resilience engagement, particularly through maintaining diversity and redundancy, managing slow variables, encouraging learning, and broadening participation. Geodiversity enriches resilience thinking by treating physical environments not as passive backdrops but as active participants in system change, and by bridging natural and social dimensions that are typically managed separately. Three interrelated barriers limit integration of resilience and geodiversity: disciplinary communities remain disconnected, evidence emphasizes description over mechanisms, and institutional infrastructure for geodiversity governance lags behind that for biodiversity. Overcoming these barriers through collaborative efforts could ground resilience thinking in the geological reality that underlies all sustainability challenges.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Toivanen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8e8904f884e66b530ddchttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02409-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Geodiversity is an inseparable but underutilized aspect of ecological connectivity assessments under climate change2026
  2. 2The multiple dimensions of geodiversity2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Geodiversity for science and society2024 · 5 citations
  4. 4The dilemma of valuing geodiversity: geoconservation versus geotourism2024 · 10 citations
  5. 5Geodiversity in Nature: Improving Natural Heritage Management 2024