PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Obstetrics and Gynecology0 citations

Pride on Purpose: Assessing the LGBTQ+ Graduate Medical Education Learning Environment ID 1005

View Full Paper
KKKyle KimPMPatrick MartaUniversity of California, Los AngelesEPErika PolancoUniversity of California, Los Angeles

Key Points

  • To evaluate the learning environment for LGBTQ+ trainees in graduate medical education.
  • Disseminated an anonymous survey to ob-gyn training programs across the country.
  • Targeted approximately 300 programs via APMOG Listserve and emails to residency coordinators.
  • Collected responses from 58 trainees regarding their experiences in the training environment.
  • 51.2% of trainees identified as LGBTQ+, compared to 11.1% of faculty.
  • 98.2% of respondents reported knowing other LGBTQ+ peers in their programs.
  • 11.6% of trainees reported mistreatment related to their LGBTQ+ identity.
  • Majority of mistreatment stemmed from faculty and ancillary staff.
  • 85.7% of trainees have a mentor they trust, but 14.3% do not.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: LGBTQ+ physicians face unique challenges throughout their careers. Limited study exists on the training environment in graduate medical education (GME) in general, but especially for minority groups. An evaluation of the current learning environment as it pertains to LGBTQ+ trainees will help inform how to better provide support and retention for trainees as they navigate the GME environment. METHODS: Dissemination of an anonymous online survey nationally to approximately 300 ob-gyn training programs via APMOG Listserve and via 48 emails to ob-gyn residency program coordinators nationwide. RESULTS: Of 58 total respondents, more trainees self-identified as LGBTQ+ than faculty (51.2% versus 11.1%, respectively). Nearly all trainees who completed the survey have identified one or more LGBTQ+ peers in their program (98.2%). 11.6% of trainees report mistreatment as it relates to being a part of the LGBTQ+ community. The majority of microaggressions directed toward trainees come from faculty and ancillary staff. Although the majority of trainees do have a mentor whom they trust (85.7%), 14.3% of trainees do not trust their mentor, despite 66.7% of trainees choosing their mentor. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: This novel pilot study explores the LGBTQ+ learning environment in GME and illustrates that LGBTQ+ trainees are a sizable component of GME in obstetrics and gynecology. LGBTQ+ trainees experience mistreatment specific to their minority group, mostly from surrounding faculty and staff. This study highlights the need to more intentionally study the GME learning environment. Future studies could investigate regional trends or longitudinal trainee experiences, such as belonging, mistreatment, or job satisfaction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8ef304f884e66b531515https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006268.38
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper