PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Clinical and Translational Science0 citationsOpen Access

A Pilot Study to Explore Length and Readability Characteristics of Subject Information Sheets/Informed Consent Forms of Clinical Trial Applications in the EU

View Full Paper
SZSophie Brunner ZieglerFEFabian EibensteinerNRNina Reumann

Key Points

  • The study aims to analyze characteristics of informed consent forms in clinical trials, focusing on length and readability.
  • Consulted CTIS public database for Phase III trials
  • Analyzed 67 drug trials from approved CTIS submissions
  • Compared SIS/ICF page and word counts across countries and sponsors
  • Assessed readability scores and document structure
  • Explored factors contributing to document length variability.
  • Median SIS/ICF length was 16 pages and 5746 words, showing substantial variability.
  • Industry-sponsored trials had longer SIS/ICFs than academic ones with a significant mean difference.
  • German SIS/ICFs averaged 4.4 pages longer than Austrian ones.
  • Formatting choices and repetition were key factors influencing length, rather than content allocation.
  • Findings suggest a need for harmonization of documents across the EU.

Abstract

The Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) enables a central joint registration of clinical trials in the EU and provides public access to key trial documents including informed consent documents. The increasing complexity and length of subject information sheets and informed consent forms (SIS/ICFs) can impact participant comprehension and willingness to enroll in a trial. This pilot study aimed to analyze the characteristics of actual SIS/ICFs from a sample of approved CTIS submissions, with a focus on Phase III trials. We consulted the CTIS public database to retrieve authorized Phase III trials. The final dataset comprised 67 drug trials submitted between January 1, 2023, and November 16, 2023. SIS/ICF page and word count, and readability scores were compared across countries, sponsorship, and other trial-related characteristics. Exploratory analyses assessed document structure and page space utilization. The median SIS/ICF length was 16 pages (IQR 11-23) and 5746 words (IQR 3508-8626), with substantial variability. Industry-sponsored trials had significantly longer SIS/ICFs than academic trials (mean difference + 8.1 pages, p < 0.01). German SIS/ICFs were on average 4.4 pages longer than Austrian SIS/ICFs (p = 0.018). Exploratory analyses suggested that formatting choices, repetition, and expanded data protection sections contributed more to length differences than content allocation or readability, thus indicating that the main drivers of SIS/ICF length are modifiable in nature. These findings underscore the need for further research into the factors influencing document length, their implications for trial participants and how a further harmonization throughout the EU can be achieved for country-specific documents.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ziegler et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa979b04f884e66b5317b2https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70580
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Adaptive platform trials: definition, design, conduct and reporting considerations2019 · 412 citations
  2. 2Getting Meaningful Informed Consent from Older Adults: A Structured Literature Review of Empirical Research1998 · 207 citations
  3. 3Academic vs. industry-sponsored trials: A global survey on differences, similarities, and future improvements2024 · 12 citations
  4. 4Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics2007 · 798 citations
  5. 5Informed consent in the Nordic countries2020 · 1 citations