PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Dis Hekimligi Dergisi (NEU Dent J) Necmettin Erbakan0 citations

Investigation of Shear Bond Strength of Restorations Produced with Different Print Thicknesses in 3D Printer: In Vitro Study

View Full Paper
FÖFatma ÖztürkİÇİrem Kübra ÇALNANuman AYDIN

Key Points

  • This research investigates how different layer thicknesses in 3D printing influence shear bond strength in dental restorations.
  • In vitro study using permanent resin specimens produced at layer thicknesses of 10 µm, 25 µm, and 50 µm.
  • Specimens were sandblasted, and surface roughness measured with an optical profilometer.
  • Shear bond strength testing conducted after bonding with self-adhesive resin cement in compliance with ISO standards.
  • No significant differences in surface roughness between specimens of different layer thicknesses (p > 0.05).
  • SBS values showed no significant variation; 10 μm: 20.94 MPa, 25 μm: 20.88 MPa, 50 μm: 19.99 MPa (p > 0.05).
  • Cohesive type fracture was observed after the shear bond strength test.

Abstract

Aim: Three-dimensional (3D) printers used in dentistry allow the fabrication of restorations with varying layer thicknesses, which can affect the mechanical properties of the material. This study aims to evaluate, under in vitro conditions, the effect of different layer thicknesses (10 µm, 25 µm, 50 µm) on the shear bond strength (SBS) of samples produced using a permanent resin material with 3D printing. Materials and Methods: In our study, specimens of permanent resin (Crowntec, Saremco) with different layer thicknesses (10 μm, 25 μm and 50 μm) were produced using a 3D printer (Asiga MAX UV, Asiga). The surface of the prepared specimens was sandblasted. After sandblasting, the surface roughness (Ra, Sa) of the specimens was measured with an optical profilometer. Then, self-adhesive resin cement was bonded to the surfaces of the specimens in a transparent mold as specified in ISO 29022:2013 standards. After aging, SBS testing was performed to determine the bond quality between the luting cement and 3D printed resin specimens. The fracture types after the bond test were examined under a microscope. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to analyze the data (p 0.05) between the surface roughness values of the specimens prepared with different layer thicknesses on the 3D printer after sandblasting. There was no statistically significant difference between the SBS value (10 μm: 20.94 MPa, 25 μm: 20.88 MPa, 50 μm: 19.99 MPa) of the specimens produced at different layer thicknesses (p>0.05). Cohesive type fracture was observed on the surface of the specimens after shear bond strength test. Conclusion: Although the layer thickness varied among the 3D printed specimens, there was no difference between the SBS values.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Öztürk et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa980604f884e66b531de4https://doi.org/10.51122/neudentj.2026.175
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper