PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics0 citations

Reproducing Guilt: Challenging the “Inappropriateness” of Guilt after Pregnancy Loss

View Full Paper
DADorian AccoeVAVictoria AdkinsERElizabeth Chloe Romanis

Key Points

  • To explore and critique the experience of guilt related to pregnancy loss.
  • Analyzed personal experiences of guilt post-pregnancy loss events.
  • Critiqued philosophical perspectives on guilt, focusing on Thomas Scanlon's theories.
  • Investigated sociopolitical expectations surrounding pregnancy-related guilt.
  • Identified societal norms that provoke feelings of guilt after pregnancy loss.
  • Challenged the notion that guilt in these contexts is inappropriate or misplaced.
  • Highlighted the need to address the norms that contribute to guilt feelings.

Abstract

Feelings of guilt have been reported by (formerly) pregnant people, for example, after miscarriage, stillbirth, induced abortion, or preterm birth. However, it is sometimes held that they should not feel that way. In this article, the authors (a) scrutinize attributions of guilt, (b) problematize philosophical approaches to guilt—especially Thomas Scanlon’s approach—and moral emotions more broadly, and (c) criticize such theoretical-normative interventions in light of sociopolitical expectations surrounding pregnancy. They conclude that, rather than denouncing experiences of guilt in perinatal contexts as “inapt” or “misplaced,” the norms and expectations that trigger and cultivate such feelings should be addressed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Accoe et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa983604f884e66b531f31https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab-2025-0006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper